Thank You

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Thank You

Post by mathjak107 » Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:12 pm

We still have not seen investors throw long term bonds in to any meaningful modern day bear market ...not in 40 years.. you can ski down the slope of the last 40 years.

Nothing I would bet the ranch on that is for sure in the 1970’s vs today.. you see Tlt fall 2% in a heart beat when investors don’t like what they see And that is in an instant on some daily noise not a trend reversing 40 years of lower and lower rates

So I would never go by the past on the 1970’s action on a treasury bond to be honest, to me this is still uncharted waters since we have had nothing in more than 40 years as an example, certainly not in more modern day markets
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2066
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Thank You

Post by Tyler » Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:29 pm

This reminds me of any number of discussions about global warming where someone mentions "this is the warmest year in 100 years" as evidence we're all going to die soon, and all I can think is "so you're telling me it was even warmer 100 years ago and we're all still here to talk about it?" ???

I hear ya, Mathjak. We just have different perspectives, and I'm not inclined to crop the data at 40 years instead of 50.
User avatar
Cortopassi
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3338
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html

Re: Thank You

Post by Cortopassi » Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:47 pm

mj, what the PP allows me to do is be invested in the blue line below. I otherwise never would have been, because in my opinion if there's a market that requires a severe correction it's the blue line. 12 years of near non-stop up and to the right movement. Sure a couple blips, esp. late last year.

I am not pooh poohing being invested in the stock market. But the one thing I see all the time from people (you included) is the thinking that bonds and gold can get dumped for decades at a time, but the stock market always bounces back. Always a buying opportunity. Until it doesn't.

The media is a huge factor in this. What gets covered? Dow Jones, S&P and Nasdaq. Rarely hear anything about bonds, and almost never gold except for when there's a "flight to safety." Trump tweets as well, hey look at the markets, everything is just peachy as long as the stock market is going up. Nevermind almost half of Americans don't own stocks.

I hate the "another record close" coverage. Gets old. Would be more fun to watch the market drop like a rock and see people freak out while the PP buffers it or even goes up. ;)

Image
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Thank You

Post by mathjak107 » Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:50 pm

Actually I am not thinking in terms of equities . I am thinking that perhaps the pp is way way to interest rate sensitive for seeing a trend reversal in bond rates..

I think it may be doing the one thing Harry preached against. And that is ruling out the fact that it may be way overly bond rate sensitive for a trend like we had for 40 years ....a reversal to historical average rates in the 5-6% range over years would be killer.

Remember we are not talking fed short term rate moves ...we are talking investors bidding bond rates back towards historical averages
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Thank You

Post by mathjak107 » Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:59 pm

Tyler wrote:
Thu Jan 02, 2020 2:29 pm
This reminds me of any number of discussions about global warming where someone mentions "this is the warmest year in 100 years" as evidence we're all going to die soon, and all I can think is "so you're telling me it was even warmer 100 years ago and we're all still here to talk about it?" ???

I hear ya, Mathjak. We just have different perspectives, and I'm not inclined to crop the data at 40 years instead of 50.
I agree , the old data is the data , it should stay ...the only question is based on modern markets and likely a 40 year drop in rates that Harry never anticipated, is the kryptonite to the pp going to be a long term trend in bond rates back up ?

I would count on the assets in the pp correlating with the economy very well ....but we are unsure of the effect of sustained rising bond rates on it just back to historical averages.. my opinion is I think caution here is a good idea . I would think twice about putting everything in the pp at this point ...I believe some should be kept in a portfolio far less interest rate sensitive just in case , like you would do a variable portfolio only this is a more conventional low risk portfolio maybe even something like Wellesley .
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Thank You

Post by Ad Orientem » Thu Jan 02, 2020 9:14 pm

I had completely forgotten this post until our resident archivist dug it up. Re-reading it I confess to a certain sense of warm nostalgia, and sadness at the apparent departure of so many great forum members. (No plans for anything special when I hit 3000.)
Post Reply