Market Manipulation

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Market Manipulation

Post by buddtholomew » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:40 am

How much credibility do PP investors give to articles that suggest that the equity, gold and treasury markets are manipulated to serve some purpose? If you are convinced that markets are driven by institutional or government entities, what, if anything, can an investor do to protect their investments. An article that I am unable to locate suggested that Goldman Sachs was purchasing GLD as other investors were selling during their recent comment to short gold. With a substantial ownership in the ETF, can GS manipulate the price of gold on a whim?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Mdraf
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 458
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 5:54 pm

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by Mdraf » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:47 am

buddtholomew wrote: How much credibility do PP investors give to articles that suggest that the equity, gold and treasury markets are manipulated to serve some purpose? If you are convinced that markets are driven by institutional or government entities, what, if anything, can an investor do to protect their investments. An article that I am unable to locate suggested that Goldman Sachs was purchasing GLD as other investors were selling during their recent comment to short gold. With a substantial ownership in the ETF, can GS manipulate the price of gold on a whim?
I read about that and more. It seems GS was telling clients to sell gold while they were buying it up. I suspect there is a certain amount of monkey business going on but there is not much we can do about it.
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by Pointedstick » Wed Sep 04, 2013 11:51 am

I believe that all markets are manipulated by the government at all times and that there is little I as an individual investor can do about this unless I withdraw from participating entirely. So given that I want to participate in order to beat inflation and hopefully earn a real return, I would prefer to have wide diversification across all the manipulated markets.

With your gold example, all one had to do was wait. And maybe pick up more gold at the artificially depressed prices, which is exactly what my PP rebalance bands had me do! Sweet sweet $1,250/oz Krugs! ;D

I expect the same will happen with bonds soon.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
mortalpawn
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Aug 13, 2013 11:06 pm

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by mortalpawn » Wed Sep 04, 2013 12:42 pm

Yes, markets do get manipulated.  One need look no further than the fed's "zero interest rate through 2015" or QE 1,2,3 to see that setting interest rates to zero or pumping a lot of cash into the world's reserve currency has a tremendous impact on the price of bonds, equities and commodities across the world.  History is also full of examples of private entities trying to corner or manipulate various markets for profit.

Without making political judgements on the merits of such attempts to prop up the market (or make profit in the case of private entities), it is a fact of modern life.

Which is why I like the PP idea - it works across four assets with very low cross-correlation to mitigate risk, and has weathered various manipulations (private and public) well over the past 40 years.
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by Ad Orientem » Wed Sep 04, 2013 2:09 pm

There is certainly an aggressive manipulation of the Bond Market going on both here and abroad. That is however no great secret and is as far as I know not seriously contested. Beyond that I am rather leery of conspiracy theories. That's not to say that there has never been or could never be some sort of conspiracy. I just find most of the more popular ones lacking in credibility.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by buddtholomew » Wed Sep 04, 2013 3:44 pm

Ad Orientem wrote: There is certainly an aggressive manipulation of the Bond Market going on both here and abroad. That is however no great secret and is as far as I know not seriously contested. Beyond that I am rather leery of conspiracy theories. That's not to say that there has never been or could never be some sort of conspiracy. I just find most of the more popular ones lacking in credibility.
Who exactly is manipulating the bond market and in what direction? IT and LT Treasury rates are increasing to the dismay of the federal reserve (unless of course they realize that inflation is rising and are willing to let these rates move upward...).
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
Ad Orientem
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3483
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 2:47 pm
Location: Florida USA
Contact:

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by Ad Orientem » Wed Sep 04, 2013 4:46 pm

The US Government has flooded the bond market for the last five years with freshly printed money. Most other central banks have done similar things. Sorry. that is manipulation on a massive scale and the fact that bond interest rates have risen a bit in no way alters that fact.
Trumpism is not a philosophy or a movement. It's a cult.
Gumby
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4012
Joined: Mon May 10, 2010 8:54 am

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by Gumby » Wed Sep 04, 2013 7:09 pm

Ad Orientem wrote: The US Government has flooded the bond market for the last five years with freshly printed money. Most other central banks have done similar things. Sorry. that is manipulation on a massive scale and the fact that bond interest rates have risen a bit in no way alters that fact.
Yes. The Fed literally has a mandate to manipulate the Federal Funds Rate (which influences the entire bond market). That's their job.
Nothing I say should be construed as advice or expertise. I am only sharing opinions which may or may not be applicable in any given case.
brownehead
Associate Member
Associate Member
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 5:59 pm
Location: Spain
Contact:

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by brownehead » Thu Sep 05, 2013 5:52 pm

Big players (and the government is one of the biggest) allways try to manipulate markets, but markets have their own forces. You talk about bond market for example, of course government can try to lower rates and can get it for some time, but if people really think higher inflation is comming they won't buy low yield bonds and less bond demand will cause higher yields.
Cartera Permanente para un mundo incerto
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by buddtholomew » Thu Sep 05, 2013 6:13 pm

Gumby wrote:
Ad Orientem wrote: The US Government has flooded the bond market for the last five years with freshly printed money. Most other central banks have done similar things. Sorry. that is manipulation on a massive scale and the fact that bond interest rates have risen a bit in no way alters that fact.
Yes. The Fed literally has a mandate to manipulate the Federal Funds Rate (which influences the entire bond market). That's their job.
So, how do we explain a 10-year yield at 3%? Isn't it in the Fed's best interest to keep rates low during a time of economic recovery?
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
AgAuMoney
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 823
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:24 pm
Location: NW USA

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by AgAuMoney » Thu Sep 05, 2013 11:13 pm

buddtholomew wrote: So, how do we explain a 10-year yield at 3%? Isn't it in the Fed's best interest to keep rates low during a time of economic recovery?
Not the Fed's interest.  Gov'ts or possibly my grandchildren's, but not the Fed's.

And yes, low rates can be construed as part of the mandate of the Fed.  One part.  They have at least three:  moderate interest rates, full employment, stable prices.  Quite the balancing act.
User avatar
moda0306
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 7680
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:05 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by moda0306 » Fri Sep 06, 2013 7:49 am

AgAuMoney wrote:
buddtholomew wrote: So, how do we explain a 10-year yield at 3%? Isn't it in the Fed's best interest to keep rates low during a time of economic recovery?
Not the Fed's interest.  Gov'ts or possibly my grandchildren's, but not the Fed's.

And yes, low rates can be construed as part of the mandate of the Fed.  One part.  They have at least three:  moderate interest rates, full employment, stable prices.  Quite the balancing act.
What does it mean to "moderate interest rates?"

I was under the impression that interest rates were a tool for the fed to use to help strike a balance between their dual mandate, price stability and full employment, not an end in and of itself.
"Men did not make the earth. It is the value of the improvements only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property. Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds."

- Thomas Paine
User avatar
AgAuMoney
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 823
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:24 pm
Location: NW USA

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by AgAuMoney » Sat Sep 07, 2013 12:23 am

Ever read the federal reserve act?

"moderate" is an adjective just like "full" and "stable."
User avatar
AgAuMoney
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 823
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 11:24 pm
Location: NW USA

Re: Market Manipulation

Post by AgAuMoney » Sat Sep 07, 2013 5:53 pm

MangoMan wrote:
AgAuMoney wrote: Ever read the federal reserve act?

"moderate" is an adjective just like "full" and "stable."
Except I think it's being used as a verb here.
No, it is not.
USC›Title12›Chapter3›SubchapterI›§225a wrote: The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Federal Open Market Committee shall ... so as to promote effectively the goals of maximum employment, stable prices, and moderate long-term interest rates.
I remembered "full" instead of "maximum" for the employment goal.  Sue me.
Post Reply