FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Discussion of the Stock portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Jake
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:01 am
Location: UK
Contact:

FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by Jake » Thu Sep 10, 2015 5:01 pm

Hello fine people,

I'd appreciate your thoughts on a question about the composition of stock ETFs used in a PP.

When it comes to low-cost stock ETFs in the UK suitable for the PP, the two main contenders are the Vanguard FTSE 100 (VUKE) and iShares FTSE 100. Their expense ratios are 0.09% and 0.07% respectively. The downside is that they are only FTSE 100, whereas Harry Browne recommended tracking the whole market. There is the DB x-trackers All-Share ETF (XASX), but it has a much higher expense ratio (0.4%).

Does it matter that the low cost ETFs are comprised of FTSE 100 only, and not the whole market?
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by MediumTex » Thu Sep 10, 2015 6:00 pm

How much of the overall capitalization of the market is captured in the top 100?

Have you compared the performance of the two indices to see what it looks like?  I would assume that the smaller index is less volatile than the whole market, but probably not by a lot.

You might split the stock allocation between the two indices and rebalance to 50/50 when you rebalance the whole portfolio.  That's probably a way to capture some volatility gains without too much effort and it gets your average expense ratio down to .24% or so for your stock funds, which isn't too bad.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
gizmo_rat
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 302
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 5:25 am

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by gizmo_rat » Fri Sep 11, 2015 6:06 am

FTSE 100 is 80% of overall market cap. The FTSE all share does pretty much just track it, although it has beaten it marginally over the last couple of decades. Probably doesn't matter.

https://www.lovemoney.com/news/45718/ft ... -investing

The question I occasionally spin my wheels on is if I should be in FTSE 250 rather than the FTSE100 / ALLSHARE. The 250 is mostly companies earning in � in the UK, the 100/ALLSHARE is heavily into international banks and resource companies earning in $ worldwide.   

So 250 to fit the PP model of the economy, or 100/ALLSHARE for diversification out of the small economy ?

I actually have all 3 so maybe I'll give the rebalance thing a whirl.
User avatar
Jake
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:01 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by Jake » Fri Sep 11, 2015 9:34 am

Thanks guys. Since there are low-cost FTSE 250 ETFs (Vanguard has one), I think I could approximate an All Share index by putting 80% of the stock allocation into the FTSE 100 ETF and 20% into the FTSE 250 ETF, with the kind of rebalancing that Tex suggested.
User avatar
Mark Leavy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1950
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by Mark Leavy » Mon Sep 14, 2015 3:20 pm

Hey Jake,  Good to see you on the board again.  I hope all is going well for you in Panama.  I was there last year for a bit and all of the buildings that weren't built by the Chinese scared the shit out of me :)

But... back to your question.  I think anything that hits more than 80% of the stock market capitalization is just fine.  The rest is just details.  Best of luck and I continue looking forward to your podcasts and adventures.
User avatar
Jake
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 147
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2011 8:01 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by Jake » Tue Sep 15, 2015 10:00 pm

Thanks Mark! We're having a great time here in Panama. I'm currently trying to get more fluent in Spanish. :)

For the UK stock ETF question, I agree that FTSE 100 is probably good enough, but I decided to go with 80% FTSE 100 and 20% FTSE 250. It's not too complicated as a solution and still doable with low cost funds.
ashantiwarrior
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue May 12, 2015 5:42 am

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by ashantiwarrior » Mon Jan 04, 2016 10:31 am

How about the SPDR FTSE All Share ETF, Ticker FTAL. Expense ratio 0.2% to track the whole market.
User avatar
lordmetroid
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 200
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2014 3:53 pm

Re: FTSE 100 vs All-Shares: does it matter? (UK PP)

Post by lordmetroid » Tue Jan 05, 2016 4:48 am

You can invest half and half. That way you can rebalance the better returns between them both.
Post Reply