for my BOND allocation, I use MediumTex's "synthetic TLT", 50% EDV, 50% VUSTX. I use Vanguard VBS as the custodian for my PP fund. Hence I have an interest in EDV.
I randomly noticed that it appears that EDV almost always trades at a premium to the NAV, most often in the 0.50%-0.75% premium, but at times even over 1.00% premium. During 2010, only 2.4% of the time it was at a discount, & during 2011Q1 only 1.6% of the time is was at a discount. Vanguard EDV page link https://personal.vanguard.com/us/funds/ ... st=tab%3A1 , scroll to the bottom of page for section "ETF premium/discount analysis".
To contrast, I looked at iShares' TLT http://tools.ishares.wallst.com/ishares ... ter=1-2011 . iShares presents the premium/discount info a little differently, but it seems that TLT is at a discount almost as often is at is at a premium to NAV. In 2011Q1, 33 of 82 days (40% of days) TLT was at a discount.
Also, using the common 2011Q1 time window, TLT was outside of the "regular" -0.50% to 0.50% of the NAV rarely, only 2.4% of days. In contrast, EDV had a premium of greater than 0.50% on 37% of the days.
Why is EDV usually at a premium to NAV?
By chance is what is occurring with EDV a milder case of what happens to standard sovereign 1 oz gold coins, which I've read here "always" have a "premium" of say 3% over "spot market gold price"?
Thx in advance for your insights!
why does EDV almost always have premium to NAV?
Moderator: Global Moderator
Re: why does EDV almost always have premium to NAV?
I'm sure it has something to do with low volume and large bid/ask spreads.
For a long term holder, this shouldn't matter much, especially if the premium to NAV is relatively stable.
For a long term holder, this shouldn't matter much, especially if the premium to NAV is relatively stable.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”