This is why you're both right.chrikenn wrote: A more appropriate question is, "given a 30 [or 40 or 50] year time horizon, would you rather own $100 of global index fund or a $100 gold coin?" I can imagine scenarios in which one would be better off with the gold coin, but at least 50% of the time (if not 90% of the time), $100 of global index fund is going to beat $100 of gold coin over a "short" period of a few decades.
We don't know exactly where our 50-year time horizon falls on history's windy, pothole-riddled road. Are we in the middle of a century of uninterrupted prosperity? If so, who would want to hang on to a lump of shiny metal? Stocks will provide the far better return.
Or are we about to travel over a bumpy, chaotic decade where promises will be broken left and right? In times like these, stocks, bonds and cash are just more promises, and throughout history, the value of so many promises has fallen to 0. You want to have a real, objective store of value, and you want to have it before everybody else is stampeding for the exits.
If we knew where we were on the path of history, investing would be easy. (Thus the desire to believe we can predict the future.) Unfortunately, I don't believe that it's possible to reliably tell whether we will be entering dark, rocky times... or whether we are on the cusp of a golden age. History is filled with both.