i'm sure the accountant & estate lawyer won't mind shuffling those things like a Vegas poker dealer :-(Lone Wolf wrote:Wow... I buy paper I-bonds every single year! I hadn't realized they made this sort of thing so painful for heirs. (While I plan to live forever as a brain in a jar, I do have to allow for the narrow possibility that I won't be around forever.)murphy_p_t wrote: After dealing w/ a 1" stack of EEs after my mother's death (RIP), I will NEVER deal with paper bonds (or probably even Treasury direct)...major league pain the the a$$, signature guarantees, UPS, Fed Reserve branch in Minn (yeah...they would talk to me @ my local Fed Res branch) & all.
treasury direct vs. bond etf
Moderator: Global Moderator
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1675
- Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2010 3:44 pm
Re: treasury direct vs. bond etf
Re: treasury direct vs. bond etf
This reason, as well as the simplicity of maintaining the long bond allocation should something happen to me has kept me a TLT man. When I was starting my PP, the standard advice was to buy the longest dated bonds you can. I am fortunate to have started the permanent portfolio with a a significant sum, so I would have either needed to create a ladder from, for example, 25-30 years, or just buy 30 year bonds, but in 7 to 10 years that large initial bolus would have shortened the duration of my holdings until time to sell. That said, 0.15 % is what it is.TBV wrote: If a new 30-year bond has a duration of about 15 or 16, then what would the duration fall to 10 years later? I ask because TLT keeps a portfolio of very new bonds while a buy-your-own-and-hold-for-10-years approach means you'll end up with comparatively older bonds.