The GOLD scream room
Moderator: Global Moderator
- Mark Leavy
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
- Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler
Re: The GOLD scream room
Budd,
I've seriously enjoyed your commentary. Angst is what makes us all think.
How much gold would you hold if you thought it was nothing more than a currency hedge?
I.e. Most of your assets are valued in US dollars. Imagine that gold represents a basket of all of the other world currencies. Nothing more, nothing less. Gold goes down if the dollar goes up. Gold goes up if the dollar goes down.
What percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to a dollar hedge?
Just brainstorming here...
Mark
I've seriously enjoyed your commentary. Angst is what makes us all think.
How much gold would you hold if you thought it was nothing more than a currency hedge?
I.e. Most of your assets are valued in US dollars. Imagine that gold represents a basket of all of the other world currencies. Nothing more, nothing less. Gold goes down if the dollar goes up. Gold goes up if the dollar goes down.
What percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to a dollar hedge?
Just brainstorming here...
Mark
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Thanks Mark; I just don’t know the answer to your question - PP is around 20% now and overall portfolio 6.9%. Target is around 7.5%Mark Leavy wrote: ↑Wed Jun 20, 2018 10:16 pmBudd,
I've seriously enjoyed your commentary. Angst is what makes us all think.
How much gold would you hold if you thought it was nothing more than a currency hedge?
I.e. Most of your assets are valued in US dollars. Imagine that gold represents a basket of all of the other world currencies. Nothing more, nothing less. Gold goes down if the dollar goes up. Gold goes up if the dollar goes down.
What percentage of your portfolio should be allocated to a dollar hedge?
Just brainstorming here...
Mark
“Gold up if dollar down” - sure; but what about International stocks as a currency hedge (VWILX holding > +40% since 2017). I’ve had success with everything but gold. Maybe one day I’ll break even.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Isn't that exactly the PP plan? At least one asset is going to stink up the joint. You just don't know which. So far for you it's been gold.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:38 amI’ve had success with everything but gold. Maybe one day I’ll break even.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Yes Xan but it’s the asset that distinguishes the PP from other portfolios right - a whole 25%. I’m just screaming in the gold room, not changing anythingXan wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 9:41 amIsn't that exactly the PP plan? At least one asset is going to stink up the joint. You just don't know which. So far for you it's been gold.buddtholomew wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 5:38 amI’ve had success with everything but gold. Maybe one day I’ll break even.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: The GOLD scream room
We should be in the Bond scream room. They are both sucking YTD
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 705
- Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:20 am
Re: The GOLD scream room
Budd,
mathjack107 reported success with the Fidelity Monitor & Insight Newsletter. He mentioned an annual gain of approximately 11% or a bit more. Sounds OK for a high net worth individual. I believe the newsletter deemphasizes gold.
The newsletter might be nice when implementing a VP.
mathjack107 reported success with the Fidelity Monitor & Insight Newsletter. He mentioned an annual gain of approximately 11% or a bit more. Sounds OK for a high net worth individual. I believe the newsletter deemphasizes gold.
The newsletter might be nice when implementing a VP.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Dollar up, gold down
Dollar down, gold down
Dollar down, gold down
-
- Associate Member
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2017 6:01 am
Re: The GOLD scream room
When you start a PP you know that gold can easily go down for 10-20 years. As long as one or more other assets make up for it. PP has performed exactly as expected.
It's not a portfolio to make money, it's for protecting your money.
There was a lot of talk about 'solid 3-5% real returns', but I don't think Browne ever said something like that himself. It was always about protecting what you can't afford to lose. So far the PP has done exactly that, during the 'lost decade' and this bull run.
What are your expectations Budd?
It's not a portfolio to make money, it's for protecting your money.
There was a lot of talk about 'solid 3-5% real returns', but I don't think Browne ever said something like that himself. It was always about protecting what you can't afford to lose. So far the PP has done exactly that, during the 'lost decade' and this bull run.
What are your expectations Budd?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2016 5:39 pm
- Location: NJ and India
Re: The GOLD scream room
Hulbert Financial Digest independently tracks the success/failure of newsletters. It is pretty well respected (?)bedraggled wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 11:33 amBudd,
mathjack107 reported success with the Fidelity Monitor & Insight Newsletter. He mentioned an annual gain of approximately 11% or a bit more. Sounds OK for a high net worth individual. I believe the newsletter deemphasizes gold.
The newsletter might be nice when implementing a VP.
This the the 20 track record of several newsletters including the Fidelity Insight one. Doesn’t look like the results that mathjak107 spoke of, although his mix may have generated more. It also shows the risk levels.
http://hulbertratings.com/20-year-scoreboard/
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Somehow everyone thinks the PP is doing what it is supposed to be doing. You mean it has been going up the last decade because of equities, right? I’ll believe it when I see Gold or LTT’s carry the portfolio during my lifetime that it is doing what it is designed to do.WhiteElephant wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:54 pmWhen you start a PP you know that gold can easily go down for 10-20 years. As long as one or more other assets make up for it. PP has performed exactly as expected.
It's not a portfolio to make money, it's for protecting your money.
There was a lot of talk about 'solid 3-5% real returns', but I don't think Browne ever said something like that himself. It was always about protecting what you can't afford to lose. So far the PP has done exactly that, during the 'lost decade' and this bull run.
What are your expectations Budd?
All I see is a drag on performance.
Last edited by buddtholomew on Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Cortopassi
- Executive Member
- Posts: 3338
- Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 2:28 pm
- Location: https://www.jwst.nasa.gov/content/webbL ... sWebb.html
Re: The GOLD scream room
I love clipping these charts. This is for all of 2000s, peak to trough. No rebalancing, 10,000 in each. A clear winner.
BUT, to budd's point, the same test for any time period 1997 and earlier to present, S&P destroys gold easily. So things are really time sensitive.
I would imagine in the matter of a short few months or years starting difference, you can have people on one side who hate gold and love stocks and vice versa just because of when they started their investing life.
So I'd rather just spread it around and accept a lower overall return, knowing I might be missing out, but also better mentally with less severe drawdowns and less concerns about most of my eggs in one basket.
ANY of the methods, 100% stocks, 60/40, PP would have been better than my haphazard investing style, as long as you are able to stick with it.
BUT, to budd's point, the same test for any time period 1997 and earlier to present, S&P destroys gold easily. So things are really time sensitive.
I would imagine in the matter of a short few months or years starting difference, you can have people on one side who hate gold and love stocks and vice versa just because of when they started their investing life.
So I'd rather just spread it around and accept a lower overall return, knowing I might be missing out, but also better mentally with less severe drawdowns and less concerns about most of my eggs in one basket.
ANY of the methods, 100% stocks, 60/40, PP would have been better than my haphazard investing style, as long as you are able to stick with it.
Re: The GOLD scream room
The PP is designed to trade some long-term performance for protection against volatility and extreme drawdowns. It's a feature, not a bug.
Just as one buys a Honda Accord instead of a Ferrari if he prioritizes reliability over flashiness, one invests in the PP instead of an all-stock portfolio if he prioritizes downside protection and stability over maximum long-term return.
Also, just as most car drivers' time is better spent driving and not constantly peeking under the hood and poking around at all the moving parts, most PP investors' time is better spent focusing on the performance of the overall portfolio and not that of its component assets.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Or, indeed, their time is better spent focusing on their real life (family, job, hobbies, volunteering) instead of their investments.Tortoise wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 7:55 pmAlso, just as most car drivers' time is better spent driving and not constantly peeking under the hood and poking around at all the moving parts, most PP investors' time is better spent focusing on the performance of the overall portfolio and not that of its component assets.
Re: The GOLD scream room
Or working to improve income....
Financially I'd be better of without Gold (I think LTT+ "cash" has been a wash for me vs TBM), but worry less. Even if do still spend too much time, um , "reviewing"....
Did put in to buy my first TBill at the next auction.
Financially I'd be better of without Gold (I think LTT+ "cash" has been a wash for me vs TBM), but worry less. Even if do still spend too much time, um , "reviewing"....
Did put in to buy my first TBill at the next auction.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
That’s a good question.WhiteElephant wrote: ↑Thu Jun 21, 2018 2:54 pmWhen you start a PP you know that gold can easily go down for 10-20 years. As long as one or more other assets make up for it. PP has performed exactly as expected.
It's not a portfolio to make money, it's for protecting your money.
There was a lot of talk about 'solid 3-5% real returns', but I don't think Browne ever said something like that himself. It was always about protecting what you can't afford to lose. So far the PP has done exactly that, during the 'lost decade' and this bull run.
What are your expectations Budd?
I’ve always assumed comparable returns to a 60/40 allocation with lower volatility and reduced drawdowns.
From that perspective the PP has fulfilled the objective.
What I can’t seem to comprehend is the agnostic nature of 4x25 with a 25% allocation to Gold.
I hold all 25% in taxable for an overall 7.5% portfolio allocation.
I “think” if some of the Gold was in tax-deferred I may feel more inclined to just let it be.
I hold REIT in retirement accounts and couldn’t care less what it is doing on a daily basis.
- dualstow
- Executive Member
- Posts: 14231
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: synagogue of Satan
- Contact:
Re: The GOLD scream room
In the archives, Harry said the 25% share was really a guideline. You don’t have to hold that much. And of course, we get around it by holding a vp.
Sam Bankman-Fried sentenced to 25 years
Re: The GOLD scream room
The best way to own gold is some way where its a little bit hard to get out of the position; physical gold. ETFs are too easy to sell. You want it a bit locked up. Then you won't worry about it. The problem people have is we have too many choices.
Even that ultra gold bull and generalized doomsayer Jim Rickards says most people should have 10% gold, and if you're really a fan then up to 20%. He never mentions 25%. I'm happy at 10%. If it takes off like Jim thinks it might, and they sky really does fall, then I won't sell until I hit a 35% rebalancing band, and take it back to 25%. That probably happens at $5,000 per ounce.
Even that ultra gold bull and generalized doomsayer Jim Rickards says most people should have 10% gold, and if you're really a fan then up to 20%. He never mentions 25%. I'm happy at 10%. If it takes off like Jim thinks it might, and they sky really does fall, then I won't sell until I hit a 35% rebalancing band, and take it back to 25%. That probably happens at $5,000 per ounce.
- Mark Leavy
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
- Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler
Re: The GOLD scream room
I run what I loosely call a 2x Permanent Portfolio.
45% 30 year bonds.
35% Physical Gold
15% Inverse Volatility (Currently SVXY - now reduced to 50% inverse of VIX)
05% T-Bill Money Market Fund (Mostly to collect bond dividends and to provide some grease for transactions)
Plus (and this is a big plus) 3 Year's living expenses in cash spread across multiple checking accounts.
So... based on this, you could say that I think the proper PP gold allocation is about 17.5%
Mark
45% 30 year bonds.
35% Physical Gold
15% Inverse Volatility (Currently SVXY - now reduced to 50% inverse of VIX)
05% T-Bill Money Market Fund (Mostly to collect bond dividends and to provide some grease for transactions)
Plus (and this is a big plus) 3 Year's living expenses in cash spread across multiple checking accounts.
So... based on this, you could say that I think the proper PP gold allocation is about 17.5%
Mark
Re: The GOLD scream room
ARGHHHH If I had converted my gold IRA to a Roth this week instead of months ago, my tax bill would've been $1,100 less!
Re: The GOLD scream room
Inverse and leveraged ETFs are dangerous sob's to buy and hold. I had my face ripped off once.
Re: The GOLD scream room
I think I agree here. Since starting to convert to physical, I feel much less attached to the daily prices. My gold is my gold. If the price falls, I'll just end up owning even more.
I don't think I could've reached this point early on. I wanted to easily move in and out of my position. Now I want stability. I can take this store of value with me wherever I go and it cannot be easily erased like the numbers I hold in my accounts. It has its own frailties, but they are unique and not correlated with the frailties of my other holdings.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
Good points; avoids marking to market daily.eufo wrote: ↑Sat Jun 23, 2018 4:16 pmI think I agree here. Since starting to convert to physical, I feel much less attached to the daily prices. My gold is my gold. If the price falls, I'll just end up owning even more.
I don't think I could've reached this point early on. I wanted to easily move in and out of my position. Now I want stability. I can take this store of value with me wherever I go and it cannot be easily erased like the numbers I hold in my accounts. It has its own frailties, but they are unique and not correlated with the frailties of my other holdings.
- Mark Leavy
- Executive Member
- Posts: 1950
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 10:20 pm
- Location: US Citizen, Permanent Traveler
Re: The GOLD scream room
Depends on what you mean by "reasonable". As ochotona implies, SVXY is a dangerous thing and can quickly go to zero. (Much like XIV did recently) But, as to your question, yes. SVXY is inverse volatility, and moves "approximately" at some multiple of SPY. Not every day and not exactly, but over time, I have found the above mix to have fairly consistent performance to a 2X PP.
You just really have to understand that SVXY is NOT a leveraged version of SPY (it is volatility) and in the case of a market crash, it really moves hard against you.
Re: The GOLD scream room
If houses were marked-to-market every day, some people would not be able to stand that information flow, and they'd remain renters.
- buddtholomew
- Executive Member
- Posts: 2464
- Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm
Re: The GOLD scream room
That’s what Zillow is for; I use the estimate to calculate equity and total net worth monthly. My house is not an investment although it has done well in the Bay Area since my purchase in 2005.