Unless they're crazy like a fox?
What do I know from P4 labs. Ok, it's in a P5 lab.
Moderator: Global Moderator
Interesting indeed. i watched the whole thing (at 1.25x speed).Tyler wrote: ↑Wed Apr 01, 2020 8:51 pm Of course I don't speak Chinese so I have to take his work for it, but I found this interesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpQFCcS ... e=youtu.be
+1
A train engineer at the Port of Los Angeles is facing federal charges for allegedly charging a locomotive off tracks toward the USNS Mercy, which he suspected is tied to a government plot, federal prosecutors said Wednesday.
Yes, they can tell if was engineered. It wasn't.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm There must be thousands of researchers examining this virus. Could some of them tell if it was engineered?
Funny how the "experts" left out the fact that the Chinese have tried to cover the whole thing up.mdwilson1991 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:33 pmYes, they can tell if was engineered. It wasn't.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm There must be thousands of researchers examining this virus. Could some of them tell if it was engineered?
Check the article I posted earlier in this thread. (We don't seem to have post numbers here, or I would just say look at post #...)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 175442.htm
To play devil's advocate: Something appearing to be naturally occurring doesn't necessarily prove that it's naturally occurring.mdwilson1991 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:33 pmYes, they can tell if was engineered. It wasn't.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm There must be thousands of researchers examining this virus. Could some of them tell if it was engineered?
Check the article I posted earlier in this thread. (We don't seem to have post numbers here, or I would just say look at post #...)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 175442.htm
People making nonsense up and putting it forth as "theory" is also deceiving.Tortoise wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:49 pmTo play devil's advocate: Something appearing to be naturally occurring doesn't necessarily prove that it's naturally occurring.mdwilson1991 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:33 pmYes, they can tell if was engineered. It wasn't.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm There must be thousands of researchers examining this virus. Could some of them tell if it was engineered?
Check the article I posted earlier in this thread. (We don't seem to have post numbers here, or I would just say look at post #...)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 175442.htm
In numerous engineering disciplines, there are examples of engineering something to look similar to, or function indistinguishably from, something natural. Cryptography is one example, in which messages are manipulated in various ways to make them look indistinguishable from random noise or gibberish.
Is it inconceivable that scientists working on creating a new pathogen might want to start with a natural virus that's benign to humans and then genetically modify it in such a way that it could plausibly be mistaken for a random mutation?
I know the study mentioned in the Science Daily article claims to rule out that possibility, but it does so based on the fact that the mutation appears to be natural. Appearances can be deceiving.
It's page 1. Not exactly a convenient post number, but you can mouse over the thread title in the specific post you want, and that will yield something like this:mdwilson1991 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:33 pmYes, they can tell if was engineered. It wasn't.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:17 pm There must be thousands of researchers examining this virus. Could some of them tell if it was engineered?
Check the article I posted earlier in this thread. (We don't seem to have post numbers here, or I would just say look at post #...)
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2 ... 175442.htm
Code: Select all
https://www.gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=10575#p191014
That actually sounds like it would make for a really fun discussion thread.mdwilson1991 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 1:59 pm I guess we can always just make shit up and say "maybe this happened, you can't prove it didn't."
+1000.123456789..........
Or a boglehead.At the heart of the scientific method is skepticism. Anyone who attempts to foreclose debate by proclaiming that the science is settled is not a scientist; he is a shill.
Let me make the simplistic, non-conspiracy answer:shekels wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 9:58 am Bill Gates on How to Kill over 10 million excess people. Yes that is excess people.....
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AEMKudv5p0
So, We will Limit Your Travels and know where you go.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A50TGg0 ... e=youtu.be
by the way Bill Gates funded the PIRBRIGHT institute, which owns the patent on coronavirus