A good guy with a gun
Moderator: Global Moderator
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Libertarian666, do you own a gun? I have been thinking about this recently, for obvious reasons. When my first daughter (who is now seven) was a baby, I asked my husband to sell his gun because I was so worried that our children would get ahold of it and accidentally shoot themselves. He did, so now we don't own a gun.
But after all this, I think that if enough innocent people carry guns for self-defense, I figure criminals might become more afraid to act.
I learned recently that foreign countries have been reluctant to attack the US since its founding because so many of us own guns, and really they protect the average citizen from a corrupt government that would only become more powerful if law-abiding citizens were stripped of this right.
I've seen some people on Facebook talk about how they taught their kids how to properly use a gun. That to me is really scary but I'd be curious to know thoughts. I'd be so worried about an accident when my kids are young or a suicide if they are a little older. I'm such a nonviolent person even knives scare me, and I don't even watch horror movies or anything because they bother me so much. I also don't like how so many movies are desensitizing children to violence.
But after all this, I think that if enough innocent people carry guns for self-defense, I figure criminals might become more afraid to act.
I learned recently that foreign countries have been reluctant to attack the US since its founding because so many of us own guns, and really they protect the average citizen from a corrupt government that would only become more powerful if law-abiding citizens were stripped of this right.
I've seen some people on Facebook talk about how they taught their kids how to properly use a gun. That to me is really scary but I'd be curious to know thoughts. I'd be so worried about an accident when my kids are young or a suicide if they are a little older. I'm such a nonviolent person even knives scare me, and I don't even watch horror movies or anything because they bother me so much. I also don't like how so many movies are desensitizing children to violence.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I'd rather not discuss this in a public forum, so I'll PM you if you don't mind.
Re: A good guy with a gun
I appreciate the armed citizen defenders in Sutherland Springs. But I'm just astounded that we have arrived here. How does this land resemble where I grew up, where you have to take a gun to worship God?
It's like "someone is poisoning the doughnuts... when poison is outlawed only outlaws will have poison... the only sure remedy is to bring antidote to the doughnut shop". Really? How about I won't go to the doughnut shop any longer?
I think churches are going to lose out. Fewer people will attend.
It's like "someone is poisoning the doughnuts... when poison is outlawed only outlaws will have poison... the only sure remedy is to bring antidote to the doughnut shop". Really? How about I won't go to the doughnut shop any longer?
I think churches are going to lose out. Fewer people will attend.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Yes, it is unfortunate, but it is reality.ochotona wrote:I appreciate the armed citizen defenders in Sutherland Springs. But I'm just astounded that we have arrived here. How does this land resemble where I grew up, where you have to take a gun to worship God?
It's like "someone is poisoning the doughnuts... when poison is outlawed only outlaws will have poison... the only sure remedy is to bring antidote to the doughnut shop". Really? How about I won't go to the doughnut shop any longer?
I think churches are going to lose out. Fewer people will attend.
I don't think people will stop going to church because they have to think about how to protect themselves.
Re: A good guy with a gun
Nothing about our current situation comprises the Founder's vision of a "well ordered militia".
There is chaos and death living amongst gun owners. It's a death culture that has taken over.
There is chaos and death living amongst gun owners. It's a death culture that has taken over.
Re: A good guy with a gun
It is a cultural problem for sure. No one wants to fix it, so it persists. I think more people will have to die before we can collectively will a change. It's sad.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
You are completely incorrect, although it is understandable given the media frenzy over these extremely rare events.ochotona wrote:Nothing about our current situation comprises the Founder's vision of a "well ordered militia".
There is chaos and death living amongst gun owners. It's a death culture that has taken over.
There are over 300 million guns in this country, and about 100 million gun owners. Fortunately, no one knows for sure how many of either there are.
However, if you aren't a gang member or a resident of certain very high crime rate areas (all with strict victim-disarmament "laws"), your chance of being killed by someone using a gun is vanishingly small.
Even including those two abnormal situations, the US doesn't have a particularly high homicide rate although it has a LOT of guns: https://crimeresearch.org/2014/03/compa ... countries/
I'm pointing this out not only for the benefit of onlookers but because you are apparently very upset over a fallacy. I hope the facts will help you feel better.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Exactly what do you propose as a change, assuming whatever you proposed would be enacted as law?eufo wrote:It is a cultural problem for sure. No one wants to fix it, so it persists. I think more people will have to die before we can collectively will a change. It's sad.
- Kriegsspiel
- Executive Member
- Posts: 4052
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 5:28 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Is it really a cultural issue, or a technological glitch? There have always been murderous psychopaths, but now they have better weapons. On the flip side, so do women, which is good because there have always been rapists too.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Correct. By the way, do you know what two crimes are reduced most effectively by having lots of weapons in a particular area?Kriegsspiel wrote:Is it really a cultural issue, or a technological glitch? There have always been murderous psychopaths, but now they have better weapons. On the flip side, so do women, which is good because there have always been rapists too.
Hot burglaries (where someone is at home), and rape.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I think statistics supports this view, but common sense tells me that the legal NRA members and people who have legally acquired guns and know how to use them properly for self-defense are generally good, honest, law-abiding citizens. It's the people who illegally use guns that are the problem. I do find it very believable that burglaries and rapes are deterred by the fear of knowing that many people have guns to defend themselves.
I don't know how to fix the problem though. I have never been attached to guns as I shared earlier, but I don't see how we can talk about any logical solution for gun control that'll solve this problem. Even if every gun were to vanish, people who want to kill masses of people can just use a car or truck to easily plow through a crowd, as we've also seen happen recently.
It is definitely a culture problem but I don't know how we could go about making it better.
I don't know how to fix the problem though. I have never been attached to guns as I shared earlier, but I don't see how we can talk about any logical solution for gun control that'll solve this problem. Even if every gun were to vanish, people who want to kill masses of people can just use a car or truck to easily plow through a crowd, as we've also seen happen recently.
It is definitely a culture problem but I don't know how we could go about making it better.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
It's actually a much smaller problem than the media attention to it indicates.Michellebell wrote:I think statistics supports this view, but common sense tells me that the legal NRA members and people who have legally acquired guns and know how to use them properly for self-defense are generally good, honest, law-abiding citizens. It's the people who illegally use guns that are the problem. I do find it very believable that burglaries and rapes are deterred by the fear of knowing that many people have guns to defend themselves.
I don't know how to fix the problem though. I have never been attached to guns as I shared earlier, but I don't see how we can talk about any logical solution for gun control that'll solve this problem. Even if every gun were to vanish, people who want to kill masses of people can just use a car or truck to easily plow through a crowd, as we've also seen happen recently.
It is definitely a culture problem but I don't know how we could go about making it better.
A far bigger problem, but still one that affects a tiny section of the population, is blacks killing one another in the inner cities. Chicago alone accounts for more deaths in any given month than the mass shooting two days ago.
And if every gun were to vanish, then women would be far more likely to be raped because the average man has more physical strength than 99.9% of all women. Would that really be an improvement?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts: 126
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2016 12:27 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
Good points.Libertarian666 wrote:It's actually a much smaller problem than the media attention to it indicates.Michellebell wrote:I think statistics supports this view, but common sense tells me that the legal NRA members and people who have legally acquired guns and know how to use them properly for self-defense are generally good, honest, law-abiding citizens. It's the people who illegally use guns that are the problem. I do find it very believable that burglaries and rapes are deterred by the fear of knowing that many people have guns to defend themselves.
I don't know how to fix the problem though. I have never been attached to guns as I shared earlier, but I don't see how we can talk about any logical solution for gun control that'll solve this problem. Even if every gun were to vanish, people who want to kill masses of people can just use a car or truck to easily plow through a crowd, as we've also seen happen recently.
It is definitely a culture problem but I don't know how we could go about making it better.
A far bigger problem, but still one that affects a tiny section of the population, is blacks killing one another in the inner cities. Chicago alone accounts for more deaths in any given month than the mass shooting two days ago.
And if every gun were to vanish, then women would be far more likely to be raped because the average man has more physical strength than 99.9% of all women. Would that really be an improvement?
Re: A good guy with a gun
The notion that women carrying guns can reduce risk of rape is interesting, so I looked into it briefly. Unfortunately, this appears to be an NRA-generated myth. It may be true but there's no study or set of data that show this convincingly.
It is known that households with a gun are statistically at higher risk of gun violence, that rape often happens with people known to the victim, and that often alcohol or drugs is involved so neither party is in shape to use a firearm safely/accurately. Comparing statistics like rape rates vs gun prevalance is fraught with problems, because of the usual issues with spurious correlations like the correlation between Nicolas Cage movies and swimming pool deaths. Moreover, I found this statement on random website, although unfortunately with no supporting study or data:
It is known that households with a gun are statistically at higher risk of gun violence, that rape often happens with people known to the victim, and that often alcohol or drugs is involved so neither party is in shape to use a firearm safely/accurately. Comparing statistics like rape rates vs gun prevalance is fraught with problems, because of the usual issues with spurious correlations like the correlation between Nicolas Cage movies and swimming pool deaths. Moreover, I found this statement on random website, although unfortunately with no supporting study or data:
That should be verifiable.in the states where guns are allowed on campus – Utah and Colorado specifically – incidents of forcible rape have increased and at a rate higher than the national average.
Re: A good guy with a gun
I agree. The definition of "rape" is so fuzzy and all-inclusive these days that you couldn't possibly do a study that would mean anything.WiseOne wrote:The notion that women carrying guns can reduce risk of rape is interesting, so I looked into it briefly. Unfortunately, this appears to be an NRA-generated myth. It may be true but there's no study or set of data that show this convincingly.
It is known that households with a gun are statistically at higher risk of gun violence, that rape often happens with people known to the victim, and that often alcohol or drugs is involved so neither party is in shape to use a firearm safely/accurately. Comparing statistics like rape rates vs gun prevalance is fraught with problems, because of the usual issues with spurious correlations like the correlation between Nicolas Cage movies and swimming pool deaths.
My own experience with guns is quite mixed. There was a time in my life when I carried concealed most of the time. I was working in a high-crime, gang-infested area and had to walk a distance to my car in the dark. It made sense then. The downside, both then and now, is that carrying a firearm is an awesome responsibility. Every minute you have to be thinking, "Where is my purse?" "Are there children in the room?" And because you've essentially taken on the responsibility of responding--potentially with deadly force--to whatever might arise, you have to be constantly aware of what's happening around you. Ultimately, I found it too much to think about day in and day out.
There was one incident, many years ago, when I was walking alone to my car late at night. A car slowed down, pulled up along the sidewalk and trailed me for half a minute or so. The car pulled over 50 feet ahead of me, and a creepy-looking guy got out and started moving toward me without saying a thing. I stopped, planted my feet firmly, drew my pistol with both hands, and said, "You take one more step toward me and I'll blow your balls off." He turned, walked back to his car, and drove away. I'm pretty sure the story would have been different had I not had a gun with me that night.
Out here in the country, it's a totally different situation. I carry a pistol frequently on the outside of my clothing, as do the majority of my neighbors. I'm frankly more concerned about cougars than two-legged predators most of the time, but there's no harm in having it known that I can protect myself from both.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I'm not sure why you need studies to prove this.WiseOne wrote:The notion that women carrying guns can reduce risk of rape is interesting, so I looked into it briefly. Unfortunately, this appears to be an NRA-generated myth. It may be true but there's no study or set of data that show this convincingly.
It is an undeniable fact that men are far stronger physically than women.
Given that, let's look at the possible scenarios:
1. If neither party has a gun, the woman has virtually no chance to protect herself effectively.
2. If the man has a gun and the woman doesn't, it's pretty much the same as #1, due to the disparity in strength between the sexes.
3. If both parties have guns, obviously it doesn't matter who is stronger, just who is the better shot.
4. But if the woman has a gun and the man doesn't, she is very likely to be able to protect herself effectively.
Note that in none of these scenarios is the woman worse off for having a gun.
However, there are studies that show this as well. Here are a few facts, with citations in the original article (see below):
Fact: When a woman was armed with a gun or knife, only 3% of rape attacks were completed, compared to 32% when the woman was unarmed.
Fact: The probability of serious injury from an attack is 2.5 times greater for women offering no resistance than for women resisting with guns. Men also benefit from using guns, but the benefits are smaller: Men are 1.4 times more likely to receive a serious injury.
(from http://www.gunfacts.info/gun-control-my ... note-97-19)
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I'm pretty sure that there are ways of concealing a weapon on your person so that you don't have to worry about where your purse is. But as a man I may have more options in that regard.Maddy wrote:I agree. The definition of "rape" is so fuzzy and all-inclusive these days that you couldn't possibly do a study that would mean anything.WiseOne wrote:The notion that women carrying guns can reduce risk of rape is interesting, so I looked into it briefly. Unfortunately, this appears to be an NRA-generated myth. It may be true but there's no study or set of data that show this convincingly.
It is known that households with a gun are statistically at higher risk of gun violence, that rape often happens with people known to the victim, and that often alcohol or drugs is involved so neither party is in shape to use a firearm safely/accurately. Comparing statistics like rape rates vs gun prevalance is fraught with problems, because of the usual issues with spurious correlations like the correlation between Nicolas Cage movies and swimming pool deaths.
My own experience with guns is quite mixed. There was a time in my life when I carried concealed most of the time. I was working in a high-crime, gang-infested area and had to walk a distance to my car in the dark. It made sense then. The downside, both then and now, is that carrying a firearm is an awesome responsibility. Every minute you have to be thinking, "Where is my purse?" "Are there children in the room?" And because you've essentially taken on the responsibility of responding--potentially with deadly force--to whatever might arise, you have to be constantly aware of what's happening around you. Ultimately, I found it too much to think about day in and day out.
But that's "just" an anecdote, not data!Maddy wrote: There was one incident, many years ago, when I was walking alone to my car late at night. A car slowed down, pulled up along the sidewalk and trailed me for half a minute or so. The car pulled over 50 feet ahead of me, and a creepy-looking guy got out and started moving toward me without saying a thing. I stopped, planted my feet firmly, drew my pistol with both hands, and said, "You take one more step toward me and I'll blow your balls off." He turned, walked back to his car, and drove away. I'm pretty sure the story would have been different had I not had a gun with me that night.
Seriously, though, you have just demonstrated the value of carrying a weapon.
Absolutely.Maddy wrote: Out here in the country, it's a totally different situation. I carry a pistol frequently on the outside of my clothing, as do the majority of my neighbors. I'm frankly more concerned about cougars than two-legged predators most of the time, but there's no harm in having it known that I can protect myself from both.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
"According to data retrieved from the Centers for Disease Control, there were 7 firearm-related homicides for every 100,000 Americans in 1993 (see light blue line in chart). By 2013 (most recent year available), the gun homicide rate had fallen by nearly 50 percent to only 3.6 homicides per 100,000 population."
And this is during a time when the number of guns per person in the US went up by about 50%!
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/cnsn ... 3-and-2013
And this is during a time when the number of guns per person in the US went up by about 50%!
https://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/cnsn ... 3-and-2013
Re: A good guy with a gun
Who said a law could fix a culture?Libertarian666 wrote:Exactly what do you propose as a change, assuming whatever you proposed would be enacted as law?eufo wrote:It is a cultural problem for sure. No one wants to fix it, so it persists. I think more people will have to die before we can collectively will a change. It's sad.
You can't dictate the kind of change we need. We need to give a shit about each other as fellow human beings. That's step one...
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
Re: A good guy with a gun
Killing each other isn't new, but neither really is our culture... it's something that has evolved over a millennia.Kriegsspiel wrote:Is it really a cultural issue, or a technological glitch? There have always been murderous psychopaths, but now they have better weapons. On the flip side, so do women, which is good because there have always been rapists too.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I misunderstood you. I thought your reference to "collectively will[ing] a change" referred to legislation.eufo wrote:Who said a law could fix a culture?Libertarian666 wrote:Exactly what do you propose as a change, assuming whatever you proposed would be enacted as law?eufo wrote:It is a cultural problem for sure. No one wants to fix it, so it persists. I think more people will have to die before we can collectively will a change. It's sad.
You can't dictate the kind of change we need. We need to give a shit about each other as fellow human beings. That's step one...
Sorry for the confusion.
Re: A good guy with a gun
Ahh... I see. No problem.Libertarian666 wrote:I misunderstood you. I thought your reference to "collectively will[ing] a change" referred to legislation.eufo wrote:Who said a law could fix a culture?Libertarian666 wrote: Exactly what do you propose as a change, assuming whatever you proposed would be enacted as law?
You can't dictate the kind of change we need. We need to give a shit about each other as fellow human beings. That's step one...
Sorry for the confusion.
I'm not a gun owner, but I strongly support people having the choice to own them. Yeah, they're dangerous, but so is heart disease and we allow McDonald's to sell Big Macs.
Don't agree with me too strongly or I'm going to change my mind
Re: A good guy with a gun
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So if I were Lord of Earth, I'd have Militias organized by County. The commander in charge of the County Militia would be an elected official. They would not report to the County Sheriff, they would be equal leaders of County government.
The Militia commander would have the right to exclude (with documented cause, not arbitrarily) from the Militia anyone he or she thought was unfit to handle weapons.
Militia members would have to qualify to bear each class of weapon. Including full auto. That means training, tests, and continuing education.
If you got excluded from one County's Militia, you could always move to another County. Obviously, Cook County, IL would be vastly different than Harris County, TX.
Revolvers, single-shot, over-under or side-by-side rifles / shotguns excluded from Militia requirements.
If you commit a crime with a gun or possess it illegally or loan someone your weapon and it gets used in a crime you go away for a long time. If you murder, you hang.
So if I were Lord of Earth, I'd have Militias organized by County. The commander in charge of the County Militia would be an elected official. They would not report to the County Sheriff, they would be equal leaders of County government.
The Militia commander would have the right to exclude (with documented cause, not arbitrarily) from the Militia anyone he or she thought was unfit to handle weapons.
Militia members would have to qualify to bear each class of weapon. Including full auto. That means training, tests, and continuing education.
If you got excluded from one County's Militia, you could always move to another County. Obviously, Cook County, IL would be vastly different than Harris County, TX.
Revolvers, single-shot, over-under or side-by-side rifles / shotguns excluded from Militia requirements.
If you commit a crime with a gun or possess it illegally or loan someone your weapon and it gets used in a crime you go away for a long time. If you murder, you hang.
-
- Executive Member
- Posts: 5994
- Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Re: A good guy with a gun
I have certainly seen worse proposals.ochotona wrote:"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
So if I were Lord of Earth, I'd have Militias organized by County. The commander in charge of the County Militia would be an elected official. They would not report to the County Sheriff, they would be equal leaders of County government.
The Militia commander would have the right to exclude (with documented cause, not arbitrarily) from the Militia anyone he or she thought was unfit to handle weapons.
Militia members would have to qualify to bear each class of weapon. Including full auto. That means training, tests, and continuing education.
If you got excluded from one County's Militia, you could always move to another County. Obviously, Cook County, IL would be vastly different than Harris County, TX.
Revolvers, single-shot, over-under or side-by-side rifles / shotguns excluded from Militia requirements.
If you commit a crime with a gun or possess it illegally or loan someone your weapon and it gets used in a crime you go away for a long time. If you murder, you hang.
But the initial clause, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State", explains why the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. It is not a limitation on that right.
Last edited by Libertarian666 on Tue Nov 07, 2017 10:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.