Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Discussion of funds that implement the Permanent Portfolio strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by Reub » Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:17 pm

PRPFX has been an underperformer, mostly due to their lighter weighting in long term treasuries. With this smaller exposure to bonds (and their recent very bearish nature) and with their ownership of commodities, agriculture, silver and Swiss Francs, is this their time to outperform the vanilla PP?
Last edited by Reub on Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by buddtholomew » Tue Jun 02, 2015 5:21 pm

Not sure Reub but even cash is outperforming the PP.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by sophie » Tue Jun 02, 2015 7:39 pm

Dear Resident Worrier,

The PP has definitely been on a roller coaster this year, but it's hardly a disaster.  Still not tempted to jump to PRPFX either.

YTD:  PP 0.4%, PRPFX 0.7%
Last 12 months:  PP 4.4%, PRPFX -2.5%

The question is what are you comparing to?  Surely not 100% stocks (VTI YTD:  3.9%), or is it a 50/50 total stock/total bond mix (YTD 2.2%)?  These have been doing quite well, and will continue to - until they don't.

Why don't you split your portfolio between the PP and a standard stock/bond allocation of your choice?  Then you can focus on whichever one is doing well at the time, and also you will have hedged your bets.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." -- Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MachineGhost » Wed Jun 03, 2015 9:55 am

sophie wrote: Why don't you split your portfolio between the PP and a standard stock/bond allocation of your choice?  Then you can focus on whichever one is doing well at the time, and also you will have hedged your bets.
Logically, it should be compared to the global financial asset portfolio which is broad 55% bonds, 45% equity.  That's the only true passive allocation since you're not making any decisions regarding subsets.

[align=center]Image[/align]
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
LC475
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 427
Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 4:23 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by LC475 » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:27 am

MachineGhost wrote: That's the only true passive allocation since you're not making any decisions regarding subsets.
::)
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by buddtholomew » Wed Jun 03, 2015 11:41 am

Sad to watch the PP perform so poorly  :(
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by Reub » Wed Jun 03, 2015 2:28 pm

All of that pie is making me hungry!
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8864
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by Pointedstick » Wed Jun 03, 2015 3:03 pm

Reub wrote: All of that pie is making me hungry!
Hear, hear!
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MediumTex » Wed Jun 03, 2015 4:38 pm

buddtholomew wrote: Sad to watch the PP perform so poorly  :(
Compared to what?
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
buddtholomew
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2464
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 4:16 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by buddtholomew » Wed Jun 03, 2015 6:57 pm

MediumTex wrote:
buddtholomew wrote: Sad to watch the PP perform so poorly  :(
Compared to what?
You pick.
"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself and you are the easiest person to fool" --Feynman.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MachineGhost » Wed Jun 03, 2015 7:12 pm

Desert wrote: I think Cullen Roche is making a decent point.  There is no truly passive, all-market-encompassing portfolio.  Even the pie chart is missing a lot of categories, including gold, non-public-REIT real estate, etc.  So I agree with his general point, that we're all active investors to some degree.  But I think he's being a bit too dramatic with his discussion; maybe because of the way "passive investors" are freaking out about it.  In my view, there is a broad spectrum from "largely passive" to "hyperactive."  The PP is closer to "largely passive," even though it deviates dramatically from the "market."
Yeah, especially since he's using 2011 data rather than 2014.  But the PP is definitely an active stance to specifically protect against all economic climates as possible.  What's wrong with that?

I think one of the main benefits that gets overlooked in having a truly global financial portfolio is you never need to rebalance.  Ever.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
bedraggled
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 705
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:20 am

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by bedraggled » Sat Jun 06, 2015 6:29 am

Anybody tested an all-world portfolio= and how does it work?
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MachineGhost » Sat Jun 06, 2015 9:00 am

Desert wrote: We should start an all world fund that just buys everything.  As you said, other than the original purchases, we wouldn't have to do anything.  Just sit back and count those ER dollars flowing in.
Cullen has since updated (Jan this year) and simplified the global financial asset portfolio:

[align=center]Image[/align]
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
sophie
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1959
Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 7:15 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by sophie » Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:08 am

That's the problem with the Boglehead portfolios.  How often do they get "adjusted" in response to the latest thinking about what an optimal portfolio should be?  Which probably involves a healthy dose of market timing, which could also be described as selling low and buying high.

I'm purposely trying to blind myself to the flood of recommended portfolios, to keep myself from tinkering with simple 3 fund lazy portfolio I set up in my 403b.  I wish Vanguard had an autorebalance feature the way TIAA CREF does, so I wouldn't have to do any monitoring other than to log in occasionally to get messages and record the balance for my asset spreadsheet.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch." -- Benjamin Franklin
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MachineGhost » Sat Jun 06, 2015 11:18 am

sophie wrote: That's the problem with the Boglehead portfolios.  How often do they get "adjusted" in response to the latest thinking about what an optimal portfolio should be?  Which probably involves a healthy dose of market timing, which could also be described as selling low and buying high.

I'm purposely trying to blind myself to the flood of recommended portfolios, to keep myself from tinkering with simple 3 fund lazy portfolio I set up in my 403b.  I wish Vanguard had an autorebalance feature the way TIAA CREF does, so I wouldn't have to do any monitoring other than to log in occasionally to get messages and record the balance for my asset spreadsheet.
FWIW, Vanguard came out with a global financial asset portfolio that was virtually the same as what Cullen did, so I think we can safely say either one is a true passive global financial portfolio that never needs changing or rebalancing.  So we add cash and real assets in the PP and this is our active approach vs the passive reference.  I'm tempted to invest in the global financial portfolio just to be a masochist (I don't believe in market-cap weighting).
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
HB Reader
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 7:34 pm

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by HB Reader » Fri Jun 26, 2015 3:45 pm

Does anyone recall any postings showing the annual results of a pairing of PRPFX with EDV or TLT (say 90/10 or 85/15)?

I thought I had seen one or two, but can't seem to find them.
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4456
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by mathjak107 » Fri Jun 26, 2015 4:29 pm

bndx does not have enough ooomph when called upon to fly fighter cover for a portfolio. it can't really do the heavy lifting  long term treasury's can.

about the best thing you can say for it is it isn't stock. it may not take away a whole lot in a downturn but it can't add much either.

while bnd was up a bit in 2008 many other total bond funds were down as they acted more like stocks then bonds.
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Is It Time For PRPFX To Shine?

Post by MediumTex » Fri Jun 26, 2015 9:22 pm

HB Reader wrote: Does anyone recall any postings showing the annual results of a pairing of PRPFX with EDV or TLT (say 90/10 or 85/15)?

I thought I had seen one or two, but can't seem to find them.
I believe it was close to the end of the massive PP thread over on the BH forum.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Post Reply