Greenland
Greenland
"We need Greenland for national security." My understanding is that we have an existing agreement that lets us do virtually anything we need militarily in Greenland. It's also under the control of an ally. Is Trump really willing to blow up NATO in order to attempt to seize Greenland? Why? Is it for the minerals? Is he just old and goofy? What am I missing?
Re: Greenland
It's all a product of all of living in incomprehensible Trump World!Xan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 11:02 am "We need Greenland for national security." My understanding is that we have an existing agreement that lets us do virtually anything we need militarily in Greenland. It's also under the control of an ally. Is Trump really willing to blow up NATO in order to attempt to seize Greenland? Why? Is it for the minerals? Is he just old and goofy? What am I missing?
No reasonable, logical explanations for a LOT of things.
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
Re: Greenland
Maybe you're right, Vinny.
Also I thought one of the worst things about a potential Harris presidency was that she wanted to do price controls. Now suddenly Trump is not only for price controls (at least for credit card interest), but he's for government ownership of companies. Isn't that straight-up communism? Yikes!
Also I thought one of the worst things about a potential Harris presidency was that she wanted to do price controls. Now suddenly Trump is not only for price controls (at least for credit card interest), but he's for government ownership of companies. Isn't that straight-up communism? Yikes!
-
whatchamacallit
- Executive Member

- Posts: 764
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm
Re: Greenland
I can't say that I have read much into the situation but I did read that there is now more European defenses going into Greenland now.
I figured that was really the end goal. If he has to threaten to take it over himself to get it to be defended then that ends up being a pretty good deal.
Coming off of the Venezuela situation makes you think we were really going to invade Greenland but I think having it defended by allies will be just as well.
The saying is, take Trump seriously but not literally.
I figured that was really the end goal. If he has to threaten to take it over himself to get it to be defended then that ends up being a pretty good deal.
Coming off of the Venezuela situation makes you think we were really going to invade Greenland but I think having it defended by allies will be just as well.
The saying is, take Trump seriously but not literally.
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member

- Posts: 2219
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Greenland
I guess it sounds like typical Trump negotiation tactics.
Re: Greenland
His administration should tell him he'd be better off buying or taking over Greece; it's warmer there, and it sounds similar in German too.
Grönland — Griechenland
Grönland — Griechenland
Re: Greenland
Don't give him / them such ideas!!! They might do it solely for the reasons that you state!
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats." AND "I'm a more-is-more person."
- dualstow
- Executive Member

- Posts: 15685
- Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
- Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
- Contact:
Re: Greenland
Greece has no natural resources.
That’s why they built a navy and conquered the world.
That’s why they built a navy and conquered the world.
Whistling tunes / We hide in the dunes by the seaside
Whistling tunes / We're kissing baboons in the jungle
Whistling tunes / We're kissing baboons in the jungle
Re: Greenland
This is what comes to my mind regarding Greenland takeover talk, Venezuela military action, ICE operations, Fed Chair criminal investigation, etc. It all distracts from the Epstein files.
Best comment I read all week: "If the Justice Dept. is as incompetent at investigating Powell as it has been in delivering all the Epstein files, Powell may be in his job for a long time."
There are way too many people possessing a "dog with a bone" mentality regarding this topic. Determined, relentless, they are not giving up until the facts come out. It will continue to haunt the administration.
Release the Epstein Files
-
Jack Jones
- Executive Member

- Posts: 745
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2015 3:12 pm
Re: Greenland
Even the seemingly innocuous Trump accounts are more of the same. The government buys up the SP500, holds it in an account for you, and then later gets a cut when you pay taxes on it.Xan wrote: ↑Fri Jan 16, 2026 4:08 pm Maybe you're right, Vinny.
Also I thought one of the worst things about a potential Harris presidency was that she wanted to do price controls. Now suddenly Trump is not only for price controls (at least for credit card interest), but he's for government ownership of companies. Isn't that straight-up communism? Yikes!
- I Shrugged
- Executive Member

- Posts: 2219
- Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 6:35 pm
Re: Greenland
Last election, we truly had two awful choices. I still feel that Harris would have been way worse, though.
And I was okay with Trump the first time. I heard it put this way recently, “The best things said about him are true, but so are the worst things.”
And I was okay with Trump the first time. I heard it put this way recently, “The best things said about him are true, but so are the worst things.”
Re: Greenland
TACO Wednesday? The President does seem to fear the bond market.
But not as much as he fears the Epstein files.
But not as much as he fears the Epstein files.
Release the Epstein Files
