Improving the PP through simplification

[Kevin K.]

Okay here's an out-of-left-field suggestion that came up on (of all places) the Bogleheads forums:

https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... CMryVLBwXi

I guess you could call this "The Three Fund Portfolio" Harry Browne-style.

I see nothing but advantages here: you eliminate the tail risk of the 30 year Treasuries, have oodles of liquidity due to the cash-like nature of the short-term Treasuries and plenty of gold for SHTF insurance. Replacing the VTI with VT would make it into even more of a bunker. I mean if the PP is for money you can't afford to lose.....

[Maple47]

Looks like a temptation...

[Smith1776]

I would personally make it intermediate-term treasury bonds instead of short-term, but this is a perfectly valid approach too.

[mathjak107]

33% gold is more than i would want . i like gold but not that much

[Smith1776]

Agree with Mathjak

[dualstow]

I do like long bonds less than I did when I was younger. Even so, “simplifying” by removing them seems like simplifying one’s hand by lopping the thumb off.

[Kevin K.]

33% gold is more than i would want . i like gold but not that much

It works even better with only 25% gold and more stocks - and trounces the regular PP even more thoroughly:

https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... Krp1br6tiF

[mathjak107]

that i can see