CMO/MBS Fund suitable for cash portion of PP?

Discussion of the Cash portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: CMO/MBS Fund suitable for cash portion of PP?

Post by craigr »

That is probably OK if the Mortgages are US agency backed for your cash. As long as the fund is stable.
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: CMO/MBS Fund suitable for cash portion of PP?

Post by craigr »

mdsw wrote:
craigr wrote: That is probably OK if the Mortgages are US agency backed for your cash. As long as the fund is stable.
The Mortgages are US agency backed and the fund itself guarantees 3.2% at the moment. It almost always guarantees something around 3%.
Just understand the risk. US agency backed does not always mean US govt. backed. Something guaranteeing 3.2% is taking more risk when you consider the typical T-Bill is about 0.1%! That extra 3.1% return is coming from somewhere and that is what would make me curious/concerned.
User avatar
AdamA
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2336
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 8:49 pm

Re: CMO/MBS Fund suitable for cash portion of PP?

Post by AdamA »

mdsw wrote: Yeah I understand. But wouldn't you say that the added risk of seeking that extra 3% is relatively nullified by the fact that the 3% is guaranteed?
No!
"All men's miseries derive from not being able to sit in a quiet room alone."

Pascal
User avatar
craigr
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2540
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:26 pm

Re: CMO/MBS Fund suitable for cash portion of PP?

Post by craigr »

mdsw wrote:Yeah I understand. But wouldn't you say that the added risk of seeking that extra 3% is relatively nullified by the fact that the 3% is guaranteed?
Guaranteed by whom? ;)

There were high yield money market funds in some 529 plans that got creamed in 2008's crash for instance. The extra return was wiped out in capital losses.
Post Reply