Figuring Out Religion

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

madbean2 wrote:
MachineGhost wrote: Wasn't Paul originally that Roman-Praetorian-Collaborator-Turned-True-Believer-But-Still-An-Asshole formerly known as Saul?  That would explain all the derision in my book.  8)
Paul was actually a Jewish Pharisee who persecuted Christians. The point of contention was whether or not Christians needed to keep the Jewish law. Paul said no, Peter and his bunch said yes (It says in Acts they changed their mind but that is historically debatable). Paul obviously won the debate, asshole or not.
He did win the debate, but I wonder if his victory didn't basically ensure that Jews would not be going along for the Christianity ride, which IMHO makes the whole Christian enterprise seem less likely to be true. 

I struggle with the idea that 99% of all Jews are in Hell for eternity because they simply chose not to follow the teachings of Paul and instead just stuck with the Old Testament rules.  At the risk of saying something that sounds totally crazy, it kind of makes God look a little bit like Hitler--i.e., under New Testament theology, God sends all Jews to Hell to suffer for eternity simply because they chose not to abandon the theological framework provided by Moses that had served the Jews relatively well for thousands of years.  In other words, God has been engaged in 2,000 years of spiritual extermination of all Jews who do not recognize Jesus as the Messiah.  Hitler's extermination of Jews didn't even last a decade.

Of course, such sadism from God isn't without precedent in the Old Testament.  Think about how many Jews must have died when God made them wander around for 40 years.  Think about how cruel it was for God to murder Job's children and destroy his health (if you go back and re-read Job, it's a lot like the movie "Trading Places" sans Jamie Lee Curtis's breasts).  Think about how pointless it was for God to tell Abraham to sacrifice his baby son just to see if he would do it.  Asking a parent to murder his own child to show his devotion is IMHO a really shitty thing to do.  Would you go to a church that made you prove your devotion to the faith by harming your children?
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4555
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by Xan »

MTex, I think many Jews did convert.  The ones who did simply stopped (if not immediately, within a couple of generations) being identifiable as Jews.  If the Law is no longer in effect, if there's no longer anything magical about that particular place, and if you can marry any Christian rather than only other Jews, then you're basically going to be merged into the much larger group of Gentile Christians.  The ones who were left, the theological descendents of the Pharisees, are defined by their rejection of God's Christ.
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

Not only did Paul ultimately win the debate about gentiles not needing to keep the law, the Christian church eventually evolved from that position to a period of some pretty vicious antisemitism, which is truly sad. You can read some pretty nasty stuff in some early Christian writings right on up to Martin Luther who was a tremendous Jew hater.

As for those nasty Old Testament things that God supposedly did to the ancient Hebrews, scholars of that period of history are nearly 100% convinced that it is mostly pure mythology. The Bible doesn't start to coincide with recorded history until some time past Solomon. Before that, there is no evidence to be found, especially the 40 year period of wandering in the wilderness. According to the Bible the number of people wandering would have been about 2 million, roughly the size of Clearwater, Florida. And yet they left no evidence. If you insist on being a true believer and taking it all literally, I guess you can reason that  God destroyed the evidence to test our faith. Same with the original manuscripts of the New Testament which were supposedly inspired and free of error. For some reason God decided to inspire them but he didn't preserve them for us. Go figure. 
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

Xan wrote: MTex, I think many Jews did convert.  The ones who did simply stopped (if not immediately, within a couple of generations) being identifiable as Jews.  If the Law is no longer in effect, if there's no longer anything magical about that particular place, and if you can marry any Christian rather than only other Jews, then you're basically going to be merged into the much larger group of Gentile Christians.  The ones who were left, the theological descendents of the Pharisees, are defined by their rejection of God's Christ.
But doesn't that line of reasoning open the door to all sorts of anti-semitism today?

Do you agree that all Jews today who are not Messianic will spend eternity in Hell?  That's an important question to answer because it represents a sort of theological stress test for Christianity.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

madbean2 wrote: Not only did Paul ultimately win the debate about gentiles not needing to keep the law, the Christian church eventually evolved from that position to a period of some pretty vicious antisemitism, which is truly sad. You can read some pretty nasty stuff in some early Christian writings right on up to Martin Luther who was a tremendous Jew hater.
I think that traditional Christian theology unfortunately invites and even encourages anti-semitism.  Why wouldn't you want to mistreat the people who not only rejected the Messiah, but actually murdered him?
As for those nasty Old Testament things that God supposedly did to the ancient Hebrews, scholars of that period of history are nearly 100% convinced that it is mostly pure mythology. The Bible doesn't start to coincide with recorded history until some time past Solomon. Before that, there is no evidence to be found, especially the 40 year period of wandering in the wilderness. According to the Bible the number of people wandering would have been about 2 million, roughly the size of Clearwater, Florida. And yet they left no evidence. If you insist on being a true believer and taking it all literally, I guess you can reason that  God destroyed the evidence to test our faith. Same with the original manuscripts of the New Testament which were supposedly inspired and free of error. For some reason God decided to inspire them but he didn't preserve them for us. Go figure.
In the part of the world where I live, lots of people consider the Bible 100% accurate cover to cover with no allowance for mythology or allegory.  To me, it only makes sense as allegory, but this position sometimes gets me labeled a Friend of the Devil, which I am not.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MediumTex wrote: In the part of the world where I live, lots of people consider the Bible 100% accurate cover to cover with no allowance for mythology or allegory.  To me, it only makes sense as allegory, but this position sometimes gets me labeled a Friend of the Devil, which I am not.
I've lived around the same kind of folks most of my life and probably was one if I am going to be honest about it.

And I must admit that the Bible worked a lot better on an emotional level when I just accepted it as the inerrant Word of God. Gave me goosebumps and I still kind of miss those.

Much easier than actually thinking about it.
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

madbean2 wrote:
MediumTex wrote: In the part of the world where I live, lots of people consider the Bible 100% accurate cover to cover with no allowance for mythology or allegory.  To me, it only makes sense as allegory, but this position sometimes gets me labeled a Friend of the Devil, which I am not.
I've lived around the same kind of folks most of my life and probably was one if I am going to be honest about it.

And I must admit that the Bible worked a lot better on an emotional level when I just accepted it as the inerrant Word of God. Gave me goosebumps and I still kind of miss those.

Much easier than actually thinking about it.
You got that right brother.  :P
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MachineGhost »

MediumTex wrote: I think that traditional Christian theology unfortunately invites and even encourages anti-semitism.  Why wouldn't you want to mistreat the people who not only rejected the Messiah, but actually murdered him?
+100.  And we know how much human beings just love to be violent sadistics towards others.  What religion was Hitler and the Nazi's and the people of Germany during WWII?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MachineGhost wrote:
MediumTex wrote: I think that traditional Christian theology unfortunately invites and even encourages anti-semitism.  Why wouldn't you want to mistreat the people who not only rejected the Messiah, but actually murdered him?
+100.  And we know how much human beings just love to be violent sadistics towards others.  What religion was Hitler and the Nazi's and the people of Germany during WWII?
Well, I have to stand up for my friend Paul here because he lays out the case for why you shouldn't mistreat the people who rejected the Messiah very well in the book of Romans, long about chapters 9 and 10, if I'm not mistaken. So don't blame it on Paul.

As for Hitler, if we're going there then maybe that will finally signal the end of this thread. I don't think Hitler was a Christian in any sense of the word but obviously it depends on your definition of the term. How much he was influenced by Martin Luther's anti-semitism I doubt we'll ever know.
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5080
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by Mountaineer »

Desert wrote:
madbean2 wrote:
MachineGhost wrote: +100.  And we know how much human beings just love to be violent sadistics towards others.  What religion was Hitler and the Nazi's and the people of Germany during WWII?
Well, I have to stand up for my friend Paul here because he lays out the case for why you shouldn't mistreat the people who rejected the Messiah very well in the book of Romans, long about chapters 9 and 10, if I'm not mistaken. So don't blame it on Paul.

As for Hitler, if we're going there then maybe that will finally signal the end of this thread. I don't think Hitler was a Christian in any sense of the word but obviously it depends on your definition of the term. How much he was influenced by Martin Luther's anti-semitism I doubt we'll ever know.
Luther did a lot of good in the world, but his end-of-life rants sound pretty ugly.  Hitler was quite influenced by Nietzsche, and while I won't blame Nietzsche for the holocaust, the idea of a master race comports well with Nietzsche's philosophy.
Following is the official LCMS position on the issue - goes back to 1983 so this certainly is not new information.  Also, I think it is important to remember that Martin Luther was a man just like the rest of us - simultaneously saint and sinner.  None of us are perfect.  All of us do things we wish we had not.  Few of us like to look in the mirror and admit our shortcomings.  It is so much easier to cast stones at others.  I shudder to think if everything in our lives would be laid bare for all to see - like I think people who run for president must be completely nuts to go under that level of scrutiny (unless of course, you are a Democrat  ;) ) - NO ONE lives a sin free life (other than Jesus  :) ).

... Mountaineer

Q:  What is the Missouri Synod's response to the anti-Semitic statements made by Luther?

A:  While The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod holds Martin Luther in high esteem for his bold proclamation and clear articulation of the teachings of Scripture, it deeply regrets and deplores statements made by Luther which express a negative and hostile attitude toward the Jews. In light of the many positive and caring statements concerning the Jews made by Luther throughout his lifetime, it would not be fair on the basis of these few regrettable (and uncharacteristic) negative statements, to characterize the reformer as "a rabid anti-Semite." The LCMS, however, does not seek to "excuse" these statements of Luther, but it denounces them (without denouncing Luther's theology). In 1983, the Synod adopted an official resolution addressing these statements of Luther and making clear its own position on anti-Semitism. The text of this resolution reads as follows:

WHEREAS, Anti-Semitism and other forms of racism are a continuing problem in our world; and

WHEREAS, Some of Luther's intemperate remarks about the Jews are often cited in this connection; and

WHEREAS, It is widely but falsely assumed that Luther's personal writings and opinions have some official status among us (thus, sometimes implying the responsibility of contemporary Lutheranism for those statements, if not complicity in them); but also

WHEREAS, It is plain from Scripture that the Gospel must be proclaimed to all people--that is, to Jews also, no more and no less than to others (Matt. 28:18-20); and

WHEREAS, This scriptural mandate is sometimes confused with anti-Semitism; therefore be it

Resolved, That we condemn any and all discrimination against others on account of race or religion or any coercion on that account and pledge ourselves to work and witness against such sins; and be it further

Resolved, That we reaffirm that the bases of our doctrine and practice are the Scriptures and the Lutheran Confessions and not Luther, as such; and be it further

Resolved, That while, on the one hand, we are deeply indebted to Luther for his rediscovery and enunciation of the Gospel, on the other hand, we deplore and disassociate ourselves from Luther's negative statements about the Jewish people, and, by the same token, we deplore the use today of such sentiments by Luther to incite anti-Christian and/or anti-Lutheran sentiment; and be it further

Resolved, That in our teaching and preaching we take care not to confuse the religion of the Old Testament (often labeled "Yahwism") with the subsequent Judaism, nor misleadingly speak about "Jews" in the Old Testament ("Israelites" or "Hebrews" being much more accurate terms), lest we obscure the basic claim of the New Testament and of the Gospel to being in substantial continuity with the Old Testament and that the fulfillment of the ancient promises came in Jesus Christ; and be it further

Resolved, That we avoid the recurring pitfall of recrimination (as illustrated by the remarks of Luther and many of the early church fathers) against those who do not respond positively to our evangelistic efforts; and be it finally

Resolved, That, in that light, we personally and individually adopt Luther's final attitude toward the Jewish people, as evidenced in his last sermon: "We want to treat them with Christian love and to pray for them, so that they might become converted and would receive the Lord" (Weimar edition, Vol. 51, p. 195).
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

Desert wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Desert wrote: No, that doesn't sound right to me; it sounds batshit-crazy.  Fortunately, Paul's teachings don't state that.  While I believe God could forgive even Hitler, there is no evidence that Hitler repented of his sin and was saved. 
Are you saying that you believe Hitler and Anne Frank are in Hell together?
I don't have any information regarding Anne Frank's eternal whereabouts.  I'm not sure why you keep sending her to hell with Hitler though.  :P
Because I believe that Paul's teachings require that all Jews who continue to follow the Old Testament law and who do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah must spend eternity in Hell and I consider that to be an obnoxious belief, and for whatever reason Christians are often reluctant to admit that their beliefs condemn most Jews through all of history to eternal damnation.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

Desert wrote:
MediumTex wrote:
Desert wrote: No, that doesn't sound right to me; it sounds batshit-crazy.  Fortunately, Paul's teachings don't state that.  While I believe God could forgive even Hitler, there is no evidence that Hitler repented of his sin and was saved. 
Are you saying that you believe Hitler and Anne Frank are in Hell together?
I don't have any information regarding Anne Frank's eternal whereabouts.  I'm not sure why you keep sending her to hell with Hitler though.  :P
Let me take another crack at explaining the point I am trying to make.

IMHO, many imagined theological disagreements are actually just cultural disputes masquerading as religious disputes.  Thus, if I went to Saudi Arabia and some of the Muslim clerics looked at me and casually told themselves that I had no chance of getting into paradise after I died, I would consider that to be more like cultural elitism than an argument for the superiority of Islam over Christianity. 

When it comes to Christianity and Judaism, however, there is no cultural divide--Christianity bills itself as basically a superior form of Judaism perfected through the fulfillment of prophecy, and one effect of that perfection through fulfillment of prophecy is that any Jews who don't come along for the ride on the new and improved religious faith must suffer the consequences of not believing in the new faith, and that is a trip to Hell for eternity.  That's what nonbelievers get in Christianity.  It's harsh, but that's how God rolls.

Now imagine if I were born and raised a Muslim and I heard about this radical new Muslim teacher from the country who said that the old ways were outdated and that the true way to connect with Allah was through a Holy Ghost type of experience, and that most of the rituals of old school Islam were now obsolete, and assume that I found this message compelling and believed it to be true.  When I heard that this new teacher was beheaded after one particularly arrogant rant against the old ways, I might start studying his teaching more deeply, and when I became convinced that he was actually sent by Allah I might start writing letters to mosques encouraging them to start following the ways of the murdered preacher, and as a kicker I might throw in that if they DIDN'T start following the ways of the murdered preacher they would spend eternity in Hell.  Now wouldn't that be a pretty inflammatory thing to do--i.e., to take over an established religion and essentially tell everyone practicing the faith in the traditional way that they were no longer doing it correctly?  That's what Paul did, and according to Paul, people like Anne Frank who saw the creation around them and knew about Christianity and instead chose to stick with the non-Christian beliefs of their culture and community cannot enter Heaven, and thus must go to Hell (there are only two places to go in the New Testament, right?).

All I'm suggesting is that behind all of his ponderous self-righteous pre-martyrdom intellectual and theological babbling, Paul's overall message actually comes across as pretty arrogant .  He was essentially saying to turn away from thousands of years of Jewish theology and tradition to follow his teachings, which were based on the life of a man he never met, and a belief system (i.e., Christianity) that he himself only a few years before had found so absurd and offensive that he organized safaris to hunt down and kill it adherents.

Paul reminds me of so many people today who can't be satisfied in simply enjoying the benefits of living their lives according to their own beliefs, and who instead feel compelled to tell everyone else that they should also live according to that same set of beliefs, with harsh penalties for non-compliance. 

Perhaps God did reveal himself to Paul on the road to Damascus, but it just seems weird that if Peter was really Jesus's best buddy, why didn't Jesus tell Peter something like: "Hey P-Dog, look here, after they murder me and I rise up from the dead into the clouds, I'm going to blind this dude who has been killing our followers and tell him to start spreading the Word, and when he agrees I'm going to give him his sight back.  Now here's the thing: this guy is going to be really good, really polished, really deep you know, not one of these country fisherman types like you, but the thing is he's also going to be kind of an arrogant prick, and try to overlook that because I really want this guy to take the place of you and the rest of the Disciples who have suffered so much for me.  I just wanted to mention it to you now so you wouldn't freak out too much later when this new guy comes on the scene and basically tells you and the rest of the 12 to beat it.  Cool?" [Jesus and Peter bump fists]

Does anyone else see this aspect of Paul's teachings?  It really bothers me a lot, and I'm surprised so few others seem troubled by it.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5080
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by Mountaineer »

Re. Paul's teachings and the First and Second Testaments:

This may or may not help in thinking about the "fairness" of Christianity and/or give some ideas to explore (note the definition of "God" as used below is the Triune God - God the Father, God the Son, God the Spirit):

1. The doctrine of two kingdoms or realms: Civil and Godly.  It is highly important to distinguish between the two.  Righteousness in the Godly kingdom is because of what Christ did for all on the cross, believers in His promises will spend eternity with Him.  Righteousness the civil kingdom expresses the love we have for neighbor - you do not have to be Christian to be "a good person".  It is very easy to think just because someone is a good person, they should not go to hell (but that thought is from our sinful self saying "I know more than God about what is right" - and we all do it.)

2. The whole First Testament was pointing to the need for a Savior after man's fall and subsequent curse of all creation in Genesis 3.  Man tried several ways to save himself through out the First Testament - they all failed.  The situation kept getting worse, spiraling downward, until God ultimately provided the means - Jesus - by entering His creation.  Many of the people in the First Testament believed in the promises of God, e.g. Abraham, Noah, the prophets, many kings and others are mentioned. 

3. The doctrine of Law and Gospel.  Law is spread throughout both Testaments.  Law tells us what God commands of us and shows us how impossible it is for humans to do all of God's commands.  Gospel is spread throughout both Testaments and tells us what God did for us.  Law always accuses us and shows us our sin, the Gospel saves us and shows us our Savior.  Most religions other than Christianity, and many traditions of Christianity, believe that man has to do something to help God in order to be saved - that is likely the basis for why so many of us think "a good person" should be saved and how unfair it is for a good person to go to hell.  However, no matter how much we want to be involved or think there must be something no matter how minor that we should do, God does not need our help in thought or deed to do His work, He just wants us to let Him be God (i.e. no idols including the idol of self or man's good deeds or objects), and believe His promises - those who do will not go to hell. 

4. The four books in the Second Testament (Gospel according to Matthew, Mark, Luke, John) tell about Jesus' life while he was in the form of man, much of it in Jesus' own words.  The rest of the First Testament is heavily commentary (e.g. Paul's writings) or what is going to happen in the future. 

... Mountaineer
Put not your trust in princes, in a son of man, in whom there is no help. Psalm 146:3
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MachineGhost »

MediumTex wrote: Because I believe that Paul's teachings require that all Jews who continue to follow the Old Testament law and who do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah must spend eternity in Hell and I consider that to be an obnoxious belief, and for whatever reason Christians are often reluctant to admit that their beliefs condemn most Jews through all of history to eternal damnation.
If you think that is obnoxious, you haven't seen how the RIFFF's (Radical Islamist Fundamentalist Fascist Fanatics) feel about it!
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MediumTex »

MachineGhost wrote:
MediumTex wrote: Because I believe that Paul's teachings require that all Jews who continue to follow the Old Testament law and who do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah must spend eternity in Hell and I consider that to be an obnoxious belief, and for whatever reason Christians are often reluctant to admit that their beliefs condemn most Jews through all of history to eternal damnation.
If you think that is obnoxious, you haven't seen how the RIFFF's (Radical Islamist Fundamentalist Fascist Fanatics) feel about it!
The thing is, since we're having this conversation among a group of mostly Americans, the core of the debate is the extent to which Christianity represents the "true" religion.  If we were having this conversation in Jordan, the core of the debate would probably be the extent to which Islam represents the "true" religion.

I think that one of the unspoken assumptions of most participants in this discussion is that Islam is a false religion, or at least it's only true to the extent that it aligns with Christianity.

I will start a separate thread titled "Figuring Out Islam" and see where that takes us.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MediumTex wrote: The thing is, since we're having this conversation among a group of mostly Americans, the core of the debate is the extent to which Christianity represents the "true" religion.
"True Religion" - I'm starting think that's an oxymoron.
Formerly known as madbean
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MediumTex wrote: Because I believe that Paul's teachings require that all Jews who continue to follow the Old Testament law and who do not believe that Jesus was the Messiah must spend eternity in Hell and I consider that to be an obnoxious belief, and for whatever reason Christians are often reluctant to admit that their beliefs condemn most Jews through all of history to eternal damnation.
I have to come to Paul's defense once again. If you look at his writings in isolation from the rest of the New Testament and from the beliefs of orthodox Christianity (in other words how they were actually written) I don't think that you can draw this conclusion. Paul believed that Jesus was going to return in his lifetime and had very little to say about the afterlife  (and the so-called Pastoral epistles which were intended to establish a formal church hierarchy after his departure are now believed to be forgeries).

As a matter of fact I don't think he even mentions the word hell though I could be wrong about that (fact checking myself, I am correct - he never used the word at all).

He did say this however....

"There will be tribulation and distress for every soul of man who does evil, of the Jew first and also of the Greek, but glory and honor and peace to everyone who does good, to the Jew first and also to the Greek".

Paul is regarded by most to be the founder of Christianity and yet those verses have always struck me as flying in the face of the orthodox belief of exclusivity and eternal torment for the unbelievers.

(And while I'm defending him, I have recently also learned that the more misogynistic verses, like forbidding women to speak in church are believed to be later additions to the original and not written by Paul).
Last edited by screwtape on Sat Jun 06, 2015 12:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MachineGhost »

madbean2 wrote: If you look at his writings in isolation from the rest of the New Testament and from the beliefs of orthodox Christianity (in other words how they were actually written) I don't think that you can draw this conclusion.
So Orthodox Christianity is the only true Christian religion and the rest are all just conveniently manipulated sects to suit the cronism or "social responsibility" needs of any particular time?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MachineGhost wrote:
madbean2 wrote: If you look at his writings in isolation from the rest of the New Testament and from the beliefs of orthodox Christianity (in other words how they were actually written) I don't think that you can draw this conclusion.
So Orthodox Christianity is the only true Christian religion and the rest are all just conveniently manipulated sects to suit the cronism or "social responsibility" needs of any particular time?
The idea that Christianity was delivered in an orthodox form via the Apostles thereafter to be defended against heresy has become more and  dubious over time as more ancient documents are discovered. Most have been lost because the orthodox ordered them to be destroyed but every once in a while some new ones turn up including a huge find in Egypt in 1945. Christianity originally came in many flavors including something called gnositicsm of which not much was known until the Egyptian discovery. There were also Ebionites who were strict Jewish believers who didn't believe Jesus was divine, and Marcionites who totally rejected the Hebrew Bible.

How it all got sorted out and became Orthodox Christianity is an interesting story, at least to someone like me who used to swallow many of the Orthodox lines.
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by MachineGhost »

madbean2 wrote: How it all got sorted out and became Orthodox Christianity is an interesting story, at least to someone like me who used to swallow many of the Orthodox lines.
I'm real curious about how that happened because I've mentioned before (before my self-imposed censorship) that there were literally thousands of different Messianic stories floating around at the time of the alleged Jesus (and presumbly many different small sects of believers for every possible iteration), so that aspect was certainly not novel at all.  But, I would think that institutionalization would be required to begin to shape any "official" religious narrative.  With Christianity, it must have happened when Constantinople co-opted what would have been the largest of the movements?
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

MachineGhost wrote:
madbean2 wrote: How it all got sorted out and became Orthodox Christianity is an interesting story, at least to someone like me who used to swallow many of the Orthodox lines.
I'm real curious about how that happened because I've mentioned before (before my self-imposed censorship) that there were literally thousands of different Messianic stories floating around at the time of the alleged Jesus (and presumbly many different small sects of believers for every possible iteration), so that aspect was certainly not novel at all.  But, I would think that institutionalization would be required to begin to shape any "official" religious narrative.  With Christianity, it must have happened when Constantinople co-opted what would have been the largest of the movements?
Yes, I think you are right about that. When Constantine made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire many believed it was the fulfillment of the prophecy in Revelations that "The Kingdoms of this world have become the Kingdoms of our Lord and of his Christ". Had this not happened I doubt that we would know Christianity in the form it is today.

To me it's a story of how to establish an official religion after a failed apocalypse.
Last edited by screwtape on Sat Jun 06, 2015 2:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as madbean
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

Desert wrote: I consider Gnosticism to be a separate religion from Christianity.  Gnosticism arose in the 2nd century, and held beliefs quite different from Christianity.
The Gnostics would disagree with you. They saw themselves as not only Christians but superior Christians having secret knowledge that other Christians didn't have. Until the discovery in 1945 all that was known about them came from the writings of early Christians condemning their beliefs but since the discovery they've been able to speak for themselves, at least a little bit. I find many of their beliefs quite interesting actually. Some are very odd, but some are along the lines of things you might hear from modern Word of Faith teachers, like Kenneth Copeland who probably would have made a good Gnostic if he had been born in that period.

And also, they didn't separate themselves from the rest of Christianity and form their own sects. They blended in and accepted the teachings and participated in the rituals. They just thought they were more advanced.
Last edited by screwtape on Sat Jun 06, 2015 2:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Formerly known as madbean
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

Desert wrote: Humans would never invent the Christian beliefs (it's nearly impossible for the rich to be saved; Jesus came to save prostitutes and tax collectors, not the rich or the educated). 
Have you not read the platform of the Democratic party?
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
Greg
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1126
Joined: Sun May 20, 2012 6:12 pm
Location: Maryland

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by Greg »

Not sure if any of you saw the "Cereal Defense" on It's Always Sunny, but they put a very amusing view of having faith not just for Christianity, but you need faith to believe in Evolution/etc. as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22bo6CKJcJM
Background: Mechanical Engineering, Robotics, Control Systems, CAD Modeling, Machining, Wearable Exoskeletons, Applied Physiology, Drawing (Pencil/Charcoal), Drums, Guitar/Bass, Piano, Flute

"you are not disabled by your disabilities but rather, abled by your abilities." -Oscar Pistorius
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Figuring Out Religion

Post by screwtape »

interactive processing wrote:
madbean2 wrote:
Desert wrote: I think the reason some folks find Gnosticism interesting, is precisely because it is so different from Orthodox Christianity. As you said, they see themselves as superior, due to the special knowledge they have uniquely received. The view of the physical world as evil is also a departure from Christianity. Gnostic beliefs regarding women and reproduction are also pretty different. Gnosticism sounds good to the proud ear; Christianity deliberately offends the proud. Humans would never invent the Christian beliefs (it's nearly impossible for the rich to be saved; Jesus came to save prostitutes and tax collectors, not the rich or the educated). Gnosticism, however, is all too human. And I think that does make it more attractive.
Okay, I get what you are saying. I find Gnosticism interesting because I'm too human.
strange. while i agree the gnostic believe they have a superior understanding (based on direct experience), i think that considering yourself superior is decidedly against the tenants of non duality, harmony, and freeing oneself from the loss of god/separation from god caused by ego that gnosticism implies.. i also don't know that they believe the physical world is evil, the relationship between the ego that sees it self as apart from the physical world and the behaviors that that separation cause that would be the evil of the physical world not the world itself.
to me gnostic seems to be the opposite of proud, it is a difficult, brutal, and humbling experience to let go of ego and the sense of separation/superiority that define proud...


One of the accusations against the Gnostics in early Christian writings was that their beliefs naturally led to licentiousness. Since they didn't believe that the material realm mattered at all, then what you did with your body didn't matter, or at least that was the accusation.

And that's one of the things that was dispelled when their own writings came to light. They actually were quite austere in their treatment of the body and in denying all forms of worldly pleasure.

And I said I found their beliefs interesting. I didn't say I wanted to be one.
Formerly known as madbean
Post Reply