Page 2 of 2
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 4:46 pm
by Fred
MediumTex wrote:
From what the Old Testament tells us about God, he is exactly the kind of being that would arbitrarily sentence someone to eternal suffering.
I was a Christian and student of the Bible for about 20 years and now that I'm no longer a believer I can't really understand how the true character of the god of the Bible never seemed to sink in. It's almost the same way I felt when I became a Christian - once I was blind, but now I see.
"The people of Samaria must bear their guilt, because they have rebelled against their God. They will fall by the sword; their little ones will be dashed to the ground, their pregnant women ripped open."
Very nice, don't you think? But God is love! He's pro-life and hates abortion but has no problem decreeing that pregnant women will be ripped open and little children "dashed to the ground".
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 5:19 pm
by Mountaineer
Pointedstick wrote:
Mountaineer, I'm beginning to suspect that our differing perspectives simply come from the different cosmological questions we're interested in pondering. Questions like, "Why am I here?" and "What is infinity?" and "Why do I have limits?" don't really hold much interest for me, and, because these questions, metaphysically speaking, are basically unanswerable without mythology and religion, I suppose those subjects don't really hold much appeal for me.
So no, I do not equate God with truth, probably because I am not religious. I don't even know if there is a God or not, but I do know that truth exists. Strictly speaking, I can test truth's existence for myself by simply saying aloud something like, "I speak." Within the boundaries of the definitions of the words "I" and "speak," that is a true statement by definition. So I know there is such a thing as truth. But I know of no similar method to verify the existence of God.
My daughter has seen Jesus ............ twice! Truth? Fact? Believable? My answer - Yes, I am convinced she did. I know when, where and with whom, but not why. Let the good times roll .... let the naysayers contribute .... Miracle? Who knows? There are miracles around us every day. I have food to eat. Water is turned to wine via a grapevine. Hurricanes are not blowing me into oblivion. Why and why not? God just is - is now, was, and will be forever. Beyond a rational mind's capability to understand. Why? Why not?
... M
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 5:34 pm
by MediumTex
Mountaineer wrote:
Pointedstick wrote:
Mountaineer, I'm beginning to suspect that our differing perspectives simply come from the different cosmological questions we're interested in pondering. Questions like, "Why am I here?" and "What is infinity?" and "Why do I have limits?" don't really hold much interest for me, and, because these questions, metaphysically speaking, are basically unanswerable without mythology and religion, I suppose those subjects don't really hold much appeal for me.
So no, I do not equate God with truth, probably because I am not religious. I don't even know if there is a God or not, but I do know that truth exists. Strictly speaking, I can test truth's existence for myself by simply saying aloud something like, "I speak." Within the boundaries of the definitions of the words "I" and "speak," that is a true statement by definition. So I know there is such a thing as truth. But I know of no similar method to verify the existence of God.
My daughter has seen Jesus ............ twice! Truth? Fact? Believable? My answer - Yes, I am convinced she did. I know when, where and with whom, but not why. Let the good times roll .... let the naysayers contribute .... Miracle? Who knows? There are miracles around us every day. I have food to eat. Water is turned to wine via a grapevine. Hurricanes are not blowing me into oblivion. Why and why not? God just is - is now, was, and will be forever. Beyond a rational mind's capability to understand. Why? Why not?
... M
I am not suggesting there aren't miracles and blessings all around us continually (along with bewildering tragedy).
What I am suggesting is that we have no real reason to attribute any of that to a single deity from the ancient world, other than because we want to.
As for whether your daughter saw Jesus, I don't have a problem believing she did, but in order for it to have any effect on me, I would need more evidence to be persuaded, but that's different than saying it didn't happen.
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:26 pm
by Mountaineer
From another forum I read:
I personally object the great natural/supernatural divide. I perceive God's hand at work in the natural processes that He created as much as in the times when He takes short cuts that we call miracles. Of course, that is something that is not proven by scientific investigation but is perceived by faith.
I like to point out that God does the miracle of the wedding at Cana every year. Every year God changes water into wine. Usually He runs the water through a grape vine and then lets yeast work on the grape juice extracted from the grapes. Jesus was in a hurry and could not wait for the usual miracle to take place so took a short cut and turned the water into wine instantly on the spot. God at work in any case.
This will not help the sceptic who is looking for extraordinary proofs to prove the existence of God or by its absence prove the absence of God. But then there are actually very few proofs in the world. Basically only in mathematics and symbolic logic can things be proven. Everywhere else the evidence must be weighed.
Even in history this is true. Consider the assassination of J. F. Kennedy. I happened just over a half century ago and there are many witnesses still alive who can recount their stories. There are mountains of evidence, even sound recordings and color film of the event. Not to mention extensive investigations. Surely if we can prove about an event to everyone's satisfaction what really happened, it should be about this most public of assassinations. So we have today complete consensus about what really happened? Not by a long shot!
Similarly the plane crashes of 9/11 and the destruction wrought. We have proven to everybody's satisfaction just what happened, no room for aberrant conspiracy theories, right? Wrong.
Faith is itself a miracle and why some people grow in their faith and others dwindle is often a mystery. But the fact that things are not always often, the way we think they should be or want them to be is no proof against God's existence. If anything it proves to me that I and everyone else is not as smart as I would like to think that I am.
"But then there are actually very few proofs in the world. Basically only in mathematics and symbolic logic can things be proven." And this is so precisely because those fields have no necessary connection to anything that actually exists. Given a hypothesis (abduction), mathematical/logical reasoning can work out its implications with absolute certainty (deduction); but it cannot ascertain whether that initial premise is true, which is necessary in order for any conclusions drawn from it to be true. For that, we must rely on our fallible interpretations of experience (induction).
For those who want to be skeptical, blind random chance, confirmation bias, anomalies, hype, hucksterism and hysteria can always be brought up to explain away both ancient and modern testimonial claims to God intervening in life. As Blaise Pascal once remarked, "There is enough light for those who only desire to see, and enough obscurity for those who have a contrary disposition."
... M
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 6:35 pm
by Fred
Mountaineer wrote:
My daughter has seen Jesus ............ twice! Truth? Fact? Believable? My answer - Yes, I am convinced she did.
Would be very interested in hearing more about that if you care to tell us. I actually think these kinds of personal testimonies reflect the power of Christianity through the ages far more than adherence to Christian dogmas and orthodox beliefs about the primacy of "scripture".
(And for the record, I also had an experience of seeing Jesus at my conversion) even though I am now an "atheist" for lack of a better term.
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:07 pm
by Mountaineer
Fred wrote:
Mountaineer wrote:
My daughter has seen Jesus ............ twice! Truth? Fact? Believable? My answer - Yes, I am convinced she did.
Would be very interested in hearing more about that if you care to tell us. I actually think these kinds of personal testimonies reflect the power of Christianity through the ages far more than adherence to Christian dogmas and orthodox beliefs about the primacy of "scripture".
(And for the record, I also had an experience of seeing Jesus at my conversion) even though I am now an "atheist" for lack of a better term.
Fred,
First time, she was about three or four. My wife had picked her up from day care. She told my wife "Mom, I saw Jesus today" out of the clear blue. My wife asked, "Where?" She said "Sitting on top of the Burger King" which was across from the day care place. My daughter was totally calm and factual about what she saw, no big deal, just like if she had seen most anything else.
Second time, she was a mid-teen. She was at a friend's house. They both saw Jesus in the upper corner of the room and a blue light. They joined the church very soon afterwards. For what it's worth, my daughter has/had never done drugs.
My daughter has told very few people, probably less than a handful, about her experiences.
... M
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Thu Sep 03, 2015 7:39 pm
by Fred
Mountaineer wrote:
First time, she was about three or four. My wife had picked her up from day care. She told my wife "Mom, I saw Jesus today" out of the clear blue. My wife asked, "Where?" She said "Sitting on top of the Burger King" which was across from the day care place. My daughter was totally calm and factual about what she saw, no big deal, just like if she had seen most anything else.
Second time, she was a mid-teen. She was at a friend's house. They both saw Jesus in the upper corner of the room and a blue light. They joined the church very soon afterwards. For what it's worth, my daughter has/had never done drugs.
My daughter has told very few people, probably less than a handful, about her experiences.
... M
I'm going to grant you having enough intelligence to not base your Christian faith on your 3 to 4 year old daughter seeing Jesus sitting on the top of Burger King even though she was totally calm when she described it to you.
I'm sure you know how silly that sounds.
Ditto in the corner of the room with a blue light when she was a teenager even though she wasn't using drugs.
Basing your faith on a strict adherence to "scripture" alone is probably your best recourse if you want to continue clinging to your beliefs but as I think I pointed out a few posts above, this is going to be even more problematic for you. The Bible is not what you think it is and I believe I can prove that to you with overwhelming evidence merely by quoting it verbatim as the very word of God you think it is.
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Fri Sep 04, 2015 5:56 am
by Mountaineer
Fred wrote:
Mountaineer wrote:
First time, she was about three or four. My wife had picked her up from day care. She told my wife "Mom, I saw Jesus today" out of the clear blue. My wife asked, "Where?" She said "Sitting on top of the Burger King" which was across from the day care place. My daughter was totally calm and factual about what she saw, no big deal, just like if she had seen most anything else.
Second time, she was a mid-teen. She was at a friend's house. They both saw Jesus in the upper corner of the room and a blue light. They joined the church very soon afterwards. For what it's worth, my daughter has/had never done drugs.
My daughter has told very few people, probably less than a handful, about her experiences.
... M
I'm going to grant you having enough intelligence to not base your Christian faith on your 3 to 4 year old daughter seeing Jesus sitting on the top of Burger King even though she was totally calm when she described it to you.
I'm sure you know how silly that sounds.
Ditto in the corner of the room with a blue light when she was a teenager even though she wasn't using drugs.
Basing your faith on a strict adherence to "scripture" alone is probably your best recourse if you want to continue clinging to your beliefs but as I think I pointed out a few posts above, this is going to be even more problematic for you. The Bible is not what you think it is and I believe I can prove that to you with overwhelming evidence merely by quoting it verbatim as the very word of God you think it is.
Fred,
You asked me for more detail. I did. Not once, did I say my faith was based on those two observations of Jesus by my daughter; that would make faith dependent on me instead of on God. Now you have turned snarky and condescending. I forgive you and pray that God gives you the gift of faith once more. Everything is a gift from God, including repentance and faith because of what Christ did for us on the cross.
... M
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:03 am
by MachineGhost
Fred wrote:
I actually gave it a go but didn't get far enough to tell you what the nature of the irreducible complexity arguments were. All I can tell you is that it started with the assertion that "evolutionists" claim that everything came about by pure chance. When I hear a straw-man argument like that I figure there is no point in continuing, especially when it's delivered in the mocking tone of the typical Christian apologist preaching to the choir (and that's what I took it for though I admittedly only listened briefly. I don't think it was a serious attempt to change the mind of someone who already believes in evolution based on scientific evidence).
+1
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:07 am
by MachineGhost
rickb wrote:
I suspect to anyone who does not already believe the Bible's creation story is a literal account of the origin of the earth this guy is going to come across as a lunatic. He's apparently a scientific adviser for the Creation Museum in Petersburg, Kentucky.
My impression is with this talk he's trying to convince Christians, not anyone else, that they shouldn't believe in evolution.
+2
Re: Evolution 2.0, Creationism, or Bunk?
Posted: Fri Oct 02, 2015 2:23 am
by MachineGhost
Fred wrote:
I was a Christian and student of the Bible for about 20 years and now that I'm no longer a believer I can't really understand how the true character of the god of the Bible never seemed to sink in. It's almost the same way I felt when I became a Christian - once I was blind, but now I see.
It's like being anoreixc. Your beliefs do not allow you to perceive actual reality. It is extremely difficult to overcome an unreality bubble like that without an external intervention.