Republican Debate Part Deux

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Republican Debate Part Deux

Post by MediumTex »

Desert wrote:
MediumTex wrote: Moda,

I agree with you.

Dismantling the government-industrial-surveillance complex would be a very hard thing to do.
I've long assumed that newly-elected presidents are taken into a special room where it is explained how things really work in this country.  "Nice little campaign, George, but we're gonna need you to shut your pie hole and start invading the Middle East.  You can choose not to, of course, but I wouldn't if I were you.  You love your family, don't you, George?"
I will never forget how George W. Bush ridiculed Gore during the 2000 debates over the futility of "nation building."  By late 2003, guess who had undertaken two of the largest nation building projects since WWII? 

Bush also ridiculed Gore for being a big spending liberal.  I don't know how much Gore would have spent as President, but it would have been hard to top Bush's multiple wars, Medicare expansion, and budget busting tax cuts.

As far as Obama and his campaign rhetoric, I am still waiting for him to keep his promise to close Guantanamo.

More and more, I am starting to think of Obama as a more urbane and suave version of Richard Nixon, except where the country was outraged at Nixon's paranoia, secrecy and attitude that he was above the law, the American people don't seem that upset at the way Obama has quietly carried on the Bush administration's consolidation of executive power and build-out of a surveillance state.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Fred
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 318
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2015 4:55 pm

Re: Republican Debate Part Deux

Post by Fred »

MediumTex wrote: More and more, I am starting to think of Obama as a more urbane and suave version of Richard Nixon, except where the country was outraged at Nixon's paranoia, secrecy and attitude that he was above the law, the American people don't seem that upset at the way Obama has quietly carried on the Bush administration's consolidation of executive power and build-out of a surveillance state.
That's a good comparison between Nixon and Obama and I've heard others make it too.

But I don't recall the American people being that outraged at Nixon. Like Obama he won two elections, one in an overwhelming landslide. I don't think the average American was any more upset about Watergate than they were about the Obama IRS scandals. The liberal media, of course, a much different story.

The thing about Nixon that always gets me is that what finally brought him down was the Watergate break-in, trying to steal some secrets from the democrats for use in the election. Conducting secret, unauthorized wars in Laos and Cambodia, killing nearly a million people, no big deal.
Last edited by Fred on Mon Sep 21, 2015 5:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Republican Debate Part Deux

Post by Reub »

Ever wonder why your opinions about isolationism gather so few votes? Let me guess. People are brainwashed.  They're manipulated.  They're uninformed. Why is Rand Paul always so low in the polling? Is it his hair?
User avatar
MediumTex
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 9096
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 11:47 pm
Contact:

Re: Republican Debate Part Deux

Post by MediumTex »

Reub wrote: Why is Rand Paul always so low in the polling? Is it his hair?
I think the hair is part of it.  Someone said that Paul's style reminded them of the Everly Brothers.  I think that people are craving a sense of "modernness" in candidates, and I think that's why people like Trump, Carson and Fiorina are inexplicably appealing to people.  These candidates are like the bell bottoms of the political fashion cycle: popular, gaudy and sort of stupid-looking.  Ross Perot blazed this trail back in 1992.

Can you imagine Trump on the debate stage with George Bush and Ronald Reagan during the 1980 campaign?
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Republican Debate Part Deux

Post by MachineGhost »

Reub wrote: Ever wonder why your opinions about isolationism gather so few votes? Let me guess. People are brainwashed.  They're manipulated.  They're uninformed. Why is Rand Paul always so low in the polling? Is it his hair?
Because isolationism is conservative and interventionism is progressive?  We're a progressive nation now, in case you haven't noticed.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Post Reply