Editing Posts - A Suggestion to Xan
Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 9:13 am
In the past, it seems as though there was a certain period of time in which a member could edit a post without a "post edited X times" notice appearing below it. That "free edit" period was useful for cleaning up spelling and grammatical errors, or for revising the wording of a post for the sake of clarity and overall readability.
This morning, I attempted to make some minor copy-editing changes to a post, all within the first few minutes, and a message immediately appeared below the post showing that I had edited it three times. When such a message appears, can create the eyebrow-raising impression that the author has made substantive changes to the post after-the-fact. Sometimes, particularly when the post is part of a debate, it can look as though the author is trying to gain an unfair argumentative advantage by revising his or her post retroactively in light of the other posters' subsequent comments.
May I suggest that there be a certain period of time (15 minutes?) in which a poster can tinker with the wording of his or her post without it showing up as an actual "edit?"
This morning, I attempted to make some minor copy-editing changes to a post, all within the first few minutes, and a message immediately appeared below the post showing that I had edited it three times. When such a message appears, can create the eyebrow-raising impression that the author has made substantive changes to the post after-the-fact. Sometimes, particularly when the post is part of a debate, it can look as though the author is trying to gain an unfair argumentative advantage by revising his or her post retroactively in light of the other posters' subsequent comments.
May I suggest that there be a certain period of time (15 minutes?) in which a poster can tinker with the wording of his or her post without it showing up as an actual "edit?"