Gold is not an investment
Posted: Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm
Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
Executive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
Such is the case with all assets (forward looking).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pmExecutive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
I don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.Kbg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 5:45 pmSuch is the case with all assets (forward looking).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pmExecutive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
IMHO - I think value stocks are the least forward looking because if you buy at the right price you don’t need earnings appreciation. If I can find a good 12 PE stock I would be happy with the 8 percent earnings forever. I don’t need the stock to go up. It will go up (if the earnings at stay at least reasonably steady), but the price of the stock does not change my 8 percent returns.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:03 amI don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.Kbg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 5:45 pmSuch is the case with all assets (forward looking).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pmExecutive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
Huh ?ppnewbie wrote: ↑Mon Jun 06, 2022 8:37 pmIMHO - I think value stocks are the least forward looking because if you buy at the right price you don’t need earnings appreciation. If I can find a good 12 PE stock I would be happy with the 8 percent earnings forever. I don’t need the stock to go up. It will go up (if the earnings at stay at least reasonably steady), but the price of the stock does not change my 8 percent returns.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:03 amI don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.Kbg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 5:45 pmSuch is the case with all assets (forward looking).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pmExecutive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
In the long run, I feel the opposite. Gold has a purpose, but it’s not going to do something new in the future, and I don’t know that a huge new discovery of gold is good for gold holders. (Miners, of course, are another story. Different investment).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:03 am I don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.
Could be...but then who is on the other side of the trade? Stocks ALWAYS have both a buyer and a seller.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:03 amI don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.Kbg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 5:45 pmSuch is the case with all assets (forward looking).I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pmExecutive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
Kbg wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 9:16 am
I Shrugged wrote: ↑Sat Jun 04, 2022 11:03 am
Kbg wrote: ↑Fri Jun 03, 2022 5:45 pm
I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 01, 2022 3:13 pm
Hal wrote: ↑Tue May 31, 2022 6:18 pm
Plus interesting insights on the value of backtesting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rbvu7eSnAnk
Executive summary that applies to some of the hand wringing about gold: the gold market is not a “what’s happening today” market. It is looking forward, longer term. And the gold market believes that the Fed will get inflation under control.
Such is the case with all assets (forward looking).
I don’t feel as if stonks are all that forward looking. More like the greater fool plan.
Could be...but then who is on the other side of the trade? Stocks ALWAYS have both a buyer and a seller.
If you find yourself a perennial bag holder, then perhaps "the market" is doing just fine but you are not doing so well "in the market."
This is all rhetorical but you get my point. The larger a stock is in market cap, I can assure you the more forward looking it is. But forward looking doesn't not mean accurate fortune telling. Forward looking means, what is known (and some publicly unknown) information is priced in as soon as it is known...and that process has done nothing but accelerate in the information age.
Dont' take this personally as an insult...but clearly you haven't read much serious investment literature as opposed to stuff for the masses.I Shrugged wrote: ↑Wed Jun 08, 2022 3:10 pm I’m sure there is a forward looking contingent among stock owners. But the overall feel is that stocks and funds are traded like short term commodities. “What’s the Fed gonna do next week?”
Doesn’t feel like anyone is doing the Warren Buffett thing.
His occasional citing of data going back to 1927 notwithstanding, Mathjak is a short-term kind of guy. Or rather a "what has my portfolio done for me lately" kind of guy. (Is that fair to say, Mathjak?) Which is fine. And I've read a lot of books that talk about "bad company, good stock" and vice versa. In the long term, buying a broad stock index fund works because companies are producing some kind of value.Desert wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 9:29 am ...
Mathjak is correct that stock prices look like a random walk in the short term, but over time you can see the valuations corresponding to earnings and discount rates. With gold, there are no cash flows, so no way to determine anything like a fair market value. So gold is always going to be less predictable than investment assets.
So you don't say on a regular basis, your portfolio is only as good as what it did for you yesterday, or something to that effect?mathjak107 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 11:25 am Not correct at all .
I have my insight models for decades with one short exceptional time frame when I went mostly pp..
you didn't mean it?mathjak wrote:You know the saying what have you done for me lately ? It’s all that counts
My portfolio determines my draw yearly ..the balance on 12/31 determines next years draw .dualstow wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 2:07 pmSo you don't say on a regular basis, your portfolio is only as good as what it did for you yesterday, or something to that effect?mathjak107 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 09, 2022 11:25 am Not correct at all .
I have my insight models for decades with one short exceptional time frame when I went mostly pp..
More specifically, for example when you wrote,
you didn't mean it?mathjak wrote:You know the saying what have you done for me lately ? It’s all that counts
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=12459&p=236967#p236967
Hansel, where are you from?