1 party owning >50% of a fund... problem?
Posted: Wed Sep 19, 2012 9:11 am
I was reading a Vangard bond fund PDF, and I noticed that it mentioned that some high percentage of the fund was owned by 1 party (so, I'm assuming a very rich person). Has this ever been a problem, or is there a theoretical problem that this could entail for the future? Like if said person decides they want to own a different fund, and pull all of their money out? Maybe there is some contract they sign before putting in so much money that they can only take it out in chunks?