Page 1 of 1
Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:46 pm
by Mountaineer
Only two choices with the poll designed to give us heartburn. Who would you vote for for President of the USA, and you have to vote for one or the other, no abstaining.
... Mountaineer
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 1:53 pm
by Libertarian666
I'd emigrate.
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:15 pm
by Ad Orientem
Libertarian666 wrote:
I'd emigrate.
+1
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 2:20 pm
by Mountaineer
TennPaGa wrote:
Who did you choose, Mountaineer?
Beheading?
I'll never tell.
... Mountaineer
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:29 pm
by moda0306
TennPaGa wrote:
Desert wrote:
I voted for Michelle, because Hillary's laugh frightens me.
I can't understand why.
Oh the fake point and smile like she found someone in the crowd that she knew.
How nauseating.
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 7:40 pm
by moda0306
Desert wrote:
moda0306 wrote:
Oh the fake point and smile like she found someone in the crowd that she knew.
How nauseating.
Yeah, it's horrible, isn't it. I wonder if anyone actually likes that kind of thing....
Whoever taught her that should be fired.
Unless it was Bill trying to prank her. Then tip o' the cap slick Willy
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2014 8:15 pm
by Pointedstick
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 11:25 am
by Jan Van
Maybe you could have added Jeb Bush to the list. It might actually end up that way. Please pick Dynasty 1, Dynasty 2 or Dynasty 3?
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2014 10:17 pm
by Reub
Even though I would have to hold my nose, Hillary by a mile. She actually may be qualified, is less an idealist leftist radical, has the husband with a much better track record, and is much less beholdent to black leftists, jihadists, and the radical liberal press.
Re: Who Would You Vote For in 2016?
Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2014 11:27 am
by Libertarian666
Reub wrote:
Even though I would have to hold my nose, Hillary by a mile. She actually may be qualified, is less an idealist leftist radical, has the husband with a much better track record, and is much less beholdent to black leftists, jihadists, and the radical liberal press.
So there is more than one Hillary Clinton? I guess that's good...
