Gyroscopic Investing

"There is at least one language, Sanskrit, which for the duration of almost 1,000 years was a living spoken language with a considerable literature of its own. Besides works of literary value, there was a long philosophical and grammatical tradition that has continued to exist with undiminished vigor until the present century. Among the accomplishments of the grammarians can be reckoned a method for paraphrasing Sanskrit in a manner that is identical not only in essence but in form with current work in Artificial Intelligence. This article demonstrates that a natural language can serve as an artificial language also, and that much work in AI has been reinventing a wheel millenia old."

(from http://www.vedicsciences.net/articles/s ... -nasa.html)

Discuss.

Neat. Echoes of something I heard a long time ago. I look forward to reading it when it's not 11pm.

Gawd, what is the TL;DR version?  My quick first impression is it is pseudo-science like the Face on Mars.

MachineGhost wrote: Gawd, what is the TL;DR version?  My quick first impression is it is pseudo-science like the Face on Mars.

Not at all. As far as I can tell, it is valid.

However, since I don't read Sanskrit, it could be bogus.

Any Sanskrit readers around to validate it? 

Libertarian666 wrote: Any Sanskrit readers around to validate it? 

Hindi, Balinese and Thai are all very close.  In Bali, I saw a lot of local signs that were still in Sanskrit and no one had any problem with them.

Excellent article - thanks for posting!

Mark Leavy wrote:

Libertarian666 wrote: Any Sanskrit readers around to validate it? 

Hindi, Balinese and Thai are all very close.  In Bali, I saw a lot of local signs that were still in Sanskrit and no one had any problem with them.

I don't think that's quite right. Thai is tonal, unlike Indonesian languages. I don't know anything about Hindi.
Anyway, Thai and various Indonesian languages do seem to borrow vocab heavily from Sanskrit or something from India, so maybe that's it.

Good to see you posting again, Mark!

I just had a great conversation at the airport bar with a guy from Sri Lanka.  He said his native tongue is Senegalese and that it is very close to Sanskrit. (I hadn't prompted him with anything...)  He hates that people think he is Indian and he can't understand Hindi at all.  I started to quiz him on the Senegalese grammar, but he really didn't get the concept of grammar.

dualstow wrote: I don't think that's quite right. Thai is tonal, unlike Indonesian languages. I don't know anything about Hindi.
Anyway, Thai and various Indonesian languages do seem to borrow vocab heavily from Sanskrit or something from India, so maybe that's it.

Good to see you posting again, Mark!

Bali is very different than Indonesian and Malaysian languages.  It is very much a different language/culture that just happens to be under Indonesian rule.  I find Bahatma Indonesian to be a very accessible language and a gateway to Malay and Cantonese, but Balinese is impossible to comprehend (for me).  The script is very similar to Thai - but that is just my western interpretation.