The Color of Pee
Posted: Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:21 am

Permanent Portfolio Forum
https://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/
You make a great point. You must pee into a clear, empty container to truly assess it's color.Xan wrote: For the transparent->amber hydration colors: are these colors calibrated for undiluted urine? Hardly any of us ever sees a significant quantity of our urine undiluted.
Or are these the colors we might see in the john? In which case, doesn't it depend entirely on what the normal water level is in our particular toilets?
Am I the last man that stands tall and glorifies in the chrominance of my stream?Austen Heller wrote:You make a great point. You must pee into a clear, empty container to truly assess it's color.Xan wrote: For the transparent->amber hydration colors: are these colors calibrated for undiluted urine? Hardly any of us ever sees a significant quantity of our urine undiluted.
Or are these the colors we might see in the john? In which case, doesn't it depend entirely on what the normal water level is in our particular toilets?
Perhaps. The femenist movement has taught men to sit - in the name of equality of output.Mark Leavy wrote:Am I the last man that stands tall and glorifies in the chrominance of my stream?Austen Heller wrote:You make a great point. You must pee into a clear, empty container to truly assess it's color.Xan wrote: For the transparent->amber hydration colors: are these colors calibrated for undiluted urine? Hardly any of us ever sees a significant quantity of our urine undiluted.
Or are these the colors we might see in the john? In which case, doesn't it depend entirely on what the normal water level is in our particular toilets?
Of course not! But in order to really see the color, a stream isn't likely to be a sufficient quantity. The radius of the stream would have to be huge. It works for me, of course, but I'm worried about the mere mortals who might try it.Mark Leavy wrote:Am I the last man that stands tall and glorifies in the chrominance of my stream?
Just don't cross the streams. It would be badXan wrote:Of course not! But in order to really see the color, a stream isn't likely to be a sufficient quantity. The radius of the stream would have to be huge. It works for me, of course, but I'm worried about the mere mortals who might try it.Mark Leavy wrote:Am I the last man that stands tall and glorifies in the chrominance of my stream?