Trans-Pacific Partnership

Other discussions not related to the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 4620
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Xan »

So what does everyone think of this big trade deal, and or the "fast track" authority which may or may not be tied to it?  I can't make heads or tails of it.  It certainly makes for some very strange bedfellows.
Simonjester wrote: “It’s declassified and made public once it’s agreed to,” Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) said of Obamatrade in Rules Committee testimony
User avatar
sixdollars
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:50 am

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by sixdollars »

Xan wrote: So what does everyone think of this big trade deal, and or the "fast track" authority which may or may not be tied to it?  I can't make heads or tails of it.  It certainly makes for some very strange bedfellows.
I'm certainly skeptical...
"There’s nothing wrong with Harry’s portfolio—nothing at all—but there’s everything wrong with his followers, who seem, on average, to chase performance the way dogs chase cars."

-William J. Bernstein
screwtape
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue May 26, 2015 7:05 pm

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by screwtape »

Democrats seem fairly well united against it so normally that would be troubling all by itself. They like to portray themselves as standing up for the downtrodden but when push comes to shove it's about wanting to give special favors to unions and I've heard that this is the primary reason for their opposition.

Republicans seem fairly well united in favor and that would be troubling all by itself. They like to portray themselves as standing up for middle class American workers but when push comes to shove it's about favoring the interest of big businesses who want more H1-B visas to displace American workers.
Formerly known as madbean
User avatar
Benko
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1900
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2011 9:40 am

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Benko »

Nancy saves the day and Cruz and Walker sided with Obama?  Yikes!

Rubio of course lies has ass off and is caught.  He cannot be trusted.
It was good being the party of Robin Hood. Until they morphed into the Sheriff of Nottingham
User avatar
Pointedstick
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 8886
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Pointedstick »

Of what little I've been able to find out about it, it seems like, among many other things, it would reduce a bunch of tariffs and impose US-style patent protection reciprocity on signer nations. I don't particularly care for the latter, but the former seems like it could be beneficial.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by MachineGhost »

Xan wrote: So what does everyone think of this big trade deal, and or the "fast track" authority which may or may not be tied to it?  I can't make heads or tails of it.  It certainly makes for some very strange bedfellows.
It's another giveaway to Big Business.  It supersedes local sovereign law (i.e. unions, class actions, environmental protection, etc.) and local judicial systems, i.e. forced to go to private world court/arbitration staffed by unelected and unaccountable corporate cronies.  Who do you think they're going to side with?  Think of the EC in Brussels who care about nothing but their own jobs and power to the detriment of the entire EU.

The FTA is because other nations don't like that Congress can debate and change the terms of trade ageements which then would require revoting in foreign legislatures all over again.  I say, too fucking bad.

I support free trade in principle, but TPP is managed trade and cronyism.
Last edited by MachineGhost on Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Reub »

If Obama negotiated it then you know it must be great for our country.
User avatar
Tyler
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2072
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 3:23 pm
Contact:

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Tyler »

Like all big government pushes of this type (see Obamacare) my big question has always been "why must it be passed in secret?" 

If openness makes complicated bills and treaties more difficult to pass because the citizens don't like the terms, I see that as a positive development. 
Last edited by Tyler on Fri Jun 12, 2015 7:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reub
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 3158
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 5:44 pm

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by Reub »

Because people are stupid and must be led around like sheep?

Because we might not like it?

Because it was influenced and/or written by special interest groups?

All of the above?
User avatar
sixdollars
Full Member
Full Member
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 10:50 am

Re: Trans-Pacific Partnership

Post by sixdollars »

MachineGhost wrote:
Xan wrote: So what does everyone think of this big trade deal, and or the "fast track" authority which may or may not be tied to it?  I can't make heads or tails of it.  It certainly makes for some very strange bedfellows.
It's another giveaway to Big Business.  It supersedes local sovereign law (i.e. unions, class actions, environmental protection, etc.) and local judicial systems, i.e. forced to go to private world court/arbitration staffed by unelected and unaccountable corporate cronies.
This is my impression as well... I believe a few snapshots of the provisions have been leaked by Wikileaks.  From what I can tell, it's misleading to call it a free trade agreement
"There’s nothing wrong with Harry’s portfolio—nothing at all—but there’s everything wrong with his followers, who seem, on average, to chase performance the way dogs chase cars."

-William J. Bernstein
Post Reply