"More than $300m of cryptocurrency has been lost after a series of bugs in a popular digital wallet service led one curious developer to accidentally take control of and then lock up the funds, according to reports."

Moderator: Global Moderator
"Effectively, a user accidentally stole hundreds of wallets simultaneously, and then set them on fire in a panic while trying to give them back."Kriegsspiel wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/ ... -bug-ether
"More than $300m of cryptocurrency has been lost after a series of bugs in a popular digital wallet service led one curious developer to accidentally take control of and then lock up the funds, according to reports."
i swear i honestly thought it would float...ochotona wrote:That's almost as bad as losing all your gold in a boating accident, which happened to me.
Thanks, dualstow!
I just sent you a PM.dualstow wrote:I don’t think it was on Mt Gox. I still have mine, though I’ve been meaning to cash it in.
I see on Nov 18, 2013, I urged Marc to spend his bitcoin already because it had reached US$600. !
Uh oh... sounds like you got ganked!dualstow wrote:I will read the pm in a sec. I just googled my wallet string which I found on page 7. Looks like I have 56 transactions and a balance of zero. Funny, I should have only one transaction:Marc’s gift. Hmm.
Ended up being a quite generous gift! To hold or to sell? (sell)dualstow wrote:False alarm; I was reading it wrong. Even though I googled my own wallet string, that seems to be Marc’s that I was looking at. (Zero bitcoins? Hope he has many wallets). I guess that’s the way the ledger works.
Turns out I still have the 0.1 btc. I’m sure I read that wrong a few years ago, too.
dualstow wrote:Even though I googled my own wallet string, that seems to be Marc’s that I was looking at. (Zero bitcoins? Hope he has many wallets). I guess that’s the way the ledger works.
Send out thedualstow wrote:I don't know if I'm looking at the complete picture, but it seems like if you know someone's wallet string, you can google it. It does show the balance as zero. Now I doubt Marc has zero, but maybe that particular wallet does.
I really know very little about bitcoin having done only one transaction: passively receiving fractional bitcoin from Marc.
(I'm waiting on verification from a trading site, but it appears to be out of order this week. Well, not appears. Customer service wrote back to me and confirmed it). So much for cashing out in a hurry. Maybe it'll be fixed when 1 bitcoin = $45.![]()
We need to ask someone who knows what they're talking about. Where's that bitcoin_in_the_vp person? Or Pointed Stick?
Cortopassi wrote:I wonder how this compares to oil and gas used to pull gold out of the ground.
Kriegsspiel wrote: Now, it's gonna take resources to make money, how does bitcoin compare to gold in the resources it takes to "make" it: bitcoin is about 7x more resource-intensive than gold. That's using an "optimistic" number for the energy requirements of bitcoin. Taken from here. But if a bitcoin is worth $6,800 and an ounce of gold is worth $1,275, maybe you could say that bitcoin is only 1.3x as resource intensive ($673 worth of currency created/barrel of oil vs $910 for gold) using the same numbers?
Thanks. Missed that.Kriegsspiel wrote:Cortopassi wrote:I wonder how this compares to oil and gas used to pull gold out of the ground.Kriegsspiel wrote: Now, it's gonna take resources to make money, how does bitcoin compare to gold in the resources it takes to "make" it: bitcoin is about 7x more resource-intensive than gold. That's using an "optimistic" number for the energy requirements of bitcoin. Taken from here. But if a bitcoin is worth $6,800 and an ounce of gold is worth $1,275, maybe you could say that bitcoin is only 1.3x as resource intensive ($673 worth of currency created/barrel of oil vs $910 for gold) using the same numbers?