Election officials enjoined from destroying evidence in Georgia

[Libertarian666]

Maybe now we'll see exactly what is going on with those voting machines!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fewfrnbatz0j ... 0.pdf?dl=0

[SomeDude]

Maybe now we'll see exactly what is going on with those voting machines!

https://www.dropbox.com/s/7fewfrnbatz0j ... 0.pdf?dl=0

Hopefully they fry Kemp. The best thing possible is every Republican involved with the fraud goes to prison and they throw away the key.

Powell said GA was the worst state of all. Looks doubtfull PA will appoint delegates to the big guy. I think im Wisconsin they found and set aside 80k votes for Biden that will get tossed. I can't remember how many they found with just MLW as the signature, maybe 30k?

So with PA, GA, and WI you dont even need MI, AZ, or NV.

I saw a few days ago some UK gambling sites were still taking bets on who wins, with Trump at a 10% chance. Will be interesting to see if that's gone up.

[pmward]

I'm actually glad there is an order to not destroy documentation (though we should not assume that Dominion would have destroyed documentation without it). I do support investigation if there is question. If they do grant the motion for investigation I really hope the state hires their own non-biased third party to do the investigation. Whenever lawyers bring their own guys to investigate anything they always fudge and skew it in whatever way benefits their side. If both sets of lawyers bring their own security experts in one side will say they proved nothing is wrong, and the other side will claim they proved fraud. Then we will be right back to same old he said, she said we currently are in.

[Cortopassi]

Did anyone watch Krebs last night on 60 minutes? Credible? Or only to me and the radical left?

Is he a never Trumper? A RINO? Or has he been scheming for years just to screw Trump in 2020?

Did he just not have the right background or experience? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Krebs

Paper recounts of machine ballots were consistent with each other. Not good enough? Is there still massive fraud, Venezuela, rigged election, rigged machines, some grand conspiracy? The top election security guy says there was no fraud, recounts prove it, but it means nothing, right?

Another honorable guy thrown under the bus by saying something that doesn't agree with Trump's view.

These people who end up giving interviews sound like perfectly reasonable, intelligent human beings, doing the best job they could.

[pmward]

Did anyone watch Krebs last night on 60 minutes? Credible? Or only to me and the radical left?

Is he a never Trumper? A RINO? Or has he been scheming for years just to screw Trump in 2020?

Did he just not have the right background or experience? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Krebs

Paper recounts of machine ballots were consistent with each other. Not good enough? Is there still massive fraud, Venezuela, rigged election, rigged machines, some grand conspiracy? The top election security guy says there was no fraud, recounts prove it, but it means nothing, right?

Another honorable guy thrown under the bus by saying something that doesn't agree with Trump's view.

These people who end up giving interviews sound like perfectly reasonable, intelligent human beings, doing the best job they could.

The recount anomaly is interesting. Like in WI Trump paid 3 mill for a recount and actually wound up losing 80 votes in the process. Also most of the Powell affidavits are for issues that would have been cleared up in the recounts.

[barrett]

Did anyone watch Krebs last night on 60 minutes? Credible? Or only to me and the radical left?

I watched and found him to be very credible. FWIW, I'm fairly centrist at this point.

[glennds]

Did anyone watch Krebs last night on 60 minutes? Credible? Or only to me and the radical left?

Is he a never Trumper? A RINO? Or has he been scheming for years just to screw Trump in 2020?

Did he just not have the right background or experience? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Krebs

Paper recounts of machine ballots were consistent with each other. Not good enough? Is there still massive fraud, Venezuela, rigged election, rigged machines, some grand conspiracy? The top election security guy says there was no fraud, recounts prove it, but it means nothing, right?

Another honorable guy thrown under the bus by saying something that doesn't agree with Trump's view.

These people who end up giving interviews sound like perfectly reasonable, intelligent human beings, doing the best job they could.

Credible is an understatement. Either that guy is solidly competent, or he is a world class actor on a level that would leave all Hollywood A listers in the dust. That was my take.

And I purposely went into that interview wearing a MAGA hat, wanting Krebs to be a marxist, leftist, scumbag, sellout, pawn of Kamala Harris, Venezuelan, Nickelback fan. But I choked.

[pmward]

Did anyone watch Krebs last night on 60 minutes? Credible? Or only to me and the radical left?

Is he a never Trumper? A RINO? Or has he been scheming for years just to screw Trump in 2020?

Did he just not have the right background or experience? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Krebs

Paper recounts of machine ballots were consistent with each other. Not good enough? Is there still massive fraud, Venezuela, rigged election, rigged machines, some grand conspiracy? The top election security guy says there was no fraud, recounts prove it, but it means nothing, right?

Another honorable guy thrown under the bus by saying something that doesn't agree with Trump's view.

These people who end up giving interviews sound like perfectly reasonable, intelligent human beings, doing the best job they could.

Credible is an understatement. Either that guy is solidly competent, or he is a world class actor on a level that would leave all Hollywood A listers in the dust. That was my take.

And I purposely went into that interview wearing a MAGA hat, wanting Krebs to be a marxist, leftist, scumbag, sellout, pawn of Kamala Harris, Venezuelan, Nickelback fan. But I choked.

Yeah, if anybody is a credible source on election security, the director of the CISA would be it. He also is both a Republican and a Trump appointee, who also served under Bush. The guy is a professional, and his job is to be non-partisan.

[pmward]

FYI video and transcript here for the Krebs interview https://www.cbsnews.com/news/election-r ... 020-11-29/

According to him in GA specifically the recount was done by hand on full paper ballots. The hand recount verified the machines. So since the recount was by hand, the machine issue could not change anything and it is a moot point.