I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4353
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Mountaineer » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:51 pm

vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:16 pm
Mountaineer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:25 pm
vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:29 am
tomfoolery wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:26 am
I agree the forum is being split in two directions and I vote we get rid of the finance and investing talk and focus on the politics. Politics is interesting and dynamically changing while the PP has been the same for 20+ years.

How hard is the permanent portfolio, really? The whole point is that it’s simple and brainless once you have it set up. Do we really need to keep discussing the best gold coin of 2020 to buy?

I come here for the politics and get sucked into reading about gold ETFs and it’s really distracting me from political conversation.
Our beloved Tomfoolery has spoken!

Amusing, as usual.

I also know this is your usual satirical comment. I for one still have tons of questions on specific implementation of various aspects of the Permanent Portfolio.

Vinny
Vinny my interweb friend, you seem to be a very very precise person. Thus my question, exactly how many questions are in a ton, or tonne if you are feeling particularly British at this particular moment ? 😉
You are correct that I can be an extremely precise person. Sometimes maddingly precise for some who have to deal with me in real life. But to better answer your question...once I get back on my Permanent Portfolio journey you shall see in real time!

Vinny
You said tons. Thus my question above. If I just watch your PP reengagement, how will I ever know exactly when you pass from one ton of questions into the second ton? Would you be kind enough to flag the appropriate end to the first ton? 🏴‍☠️🇺🇸🇬🇧🏴‍☠️ ;) ;D O0
The darkness will always war against the light. And the light must always war against the darkness. You either let the darkness overcome you, or you overcome the darkness. The mission: Whatever darkness, compromise, or ungodly thing still exists in your life, no matter how small, today, root it out. There is no middle ground.
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5647
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by vnatale » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:52 pm

dualstow wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:30 pm
I have to agree with doodle on this. It's a bit silly invoking Trump as someone who stands up to bullies...
..or is it?

I can see both sides.
On a personal level, yes, Trump will sue you for attacking him or give harder than he got. It's fair to say he's something of a bully.
In the realm of politics, he doesn't put up with what he perceives as bs. So somedude's point is valid.
No two sides to Trump. He is and out and out bully, exhibiting ALL the traits of a bully. One of those traits is that whenever he as gets even a tiny portion back at him that he dishes out with regularity he goes into FULL crybaby mode.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
User avatar
l82start
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by l82start » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:55 pm

in a thread about sticking to investing, the trump bad - politics posting has gotten pretty thick,

what are we protesting about again?
Government 2020+ - a BANANA REPUBLIC - if you can keep it

Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4353
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Mountaineer » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:56 pm

vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:52 pm
dualstow wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:30 pm
I have to agree with doodle on this. It's a bit silly invoking Trump as someone who stands up to bullies...
..or is it?

I can see both sides.
On a personal level, yes, Trump will sue you for attacking him or give harder than he got. It's fair to say he's something of a bully.
In the realm of politics, he doesn't put up with what he perceives as bs. So somedude's point is valid.
No two sides to Trump. He is and out and out bully, exhibiting ALL the traits of a bully. One of those traits is that whenever he as gets even a tiny portion back at him that he dishes out with regularity he goes into FULL crybaby mode.

Vinny
Crybaby or just luring the suckers into pitbull territory? I am not quite sure.
The darkness will always war against the light. And the light must always war against the darkness. You either let the darkness overcome you, or you overcome the darkness. The mission: Whatever darkness, compromise, or ungodly thing still exists in your life, no matter how small, today, root it out. There is no middle ground.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:59 pm

l82start wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:55 pm
in a thread about sticking to investing, the trump bad - politics posting has gotten pretty thick,
Yeah I guess it probably would be a hopeless cause splitting it off to a different site.
User avatar
doodle
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4360
Joined: Fri Feb 11, 2011 2:17 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by doodle » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:00 pm

l82start wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:55 pm
in a thread about sticking to investing, the trump bad - politics posting has gotten pretty thick,

what are we protesting about again?
I'm just responding to Some Guys praise of Trump standing up to bullies. Anyways, I'm supposed to be on a forum vacation. I need to split.
User avatar
l82start
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by l82start » Wed Dec 02, 2020 4:01 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:59 pm
l82start wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:55 pm
in a thread about sticking to investing, the trump bad - politics posting has gotten pretty thick,
Yeah I guess it probably would be a hopeless cause splitting it off to a different site.
LOL agreed
Government 2020+ - a BANANA REPUBLIC - if you can keep it

Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5647
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by vnatale » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:00 pm

Mountaineer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:51 pm
vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:16 pm
Mountaineer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:25 pm
vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:29 am
tomfoolery wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 11:26 am
I agree the forum is being split in two directions and I vote we get rid of the finance and investing talk and focus on the politics. Politics is interesting and dynamically changing while the PP has been the same for 20+ years.

How hard is the permanent portfolio, really? The whole point is that it’s simple and brainless once you have it set up. Do we really need to keep discussing the best gold coin of 2020 to buy?

I come here for the politics and get sucked into reading about gold ETFs and it’s really distracting me from political conversation.
Our beloved Tomfoolery has spoken!

Amusing, as usual.

I also know this is your usual satirical comment. I for one still have tons of questions on specific implementation of various aspects of the Permanent Portfolio.

Vinny
Vinny my interweb friend, you seem to be a very very precise person. Thus my question, exactly how many questions are in a ton, or tonne if you are feeling particularly British at this particular moment ? 😉
You are correct that I can be an extremely precise person. Sometimes maddingly precise for some who have to deal with me in real life. But to better answer your question...once I get back on my Permanent Portfolio journey you shall see in real time!

Vinny
You said tons. Thus my question above. If I just watch your PP reengagement, how will I ever know exactly when you pass from one ton of questions into the second ton? Would you be kind enough to flag the appropriate end to the first ton? 🏴‍☠️🇺🇸🇬🇧🏴‍☠️ ;) ;D O0
I will endeavor to do so just for my dear friend known as Mountaineer!

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5647
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by vnatale » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:01 pm

Mountaineer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:56 pm
vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:52 pm
dualstow wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:30 pm
I have to agree with doodle on this. It's a bit silly invoking Trump as someone who stands up to bullies...
..or is it?

I can see both sides.
On a personal level, yes, Trump will sue you for attacking him or give harder than he got. It's fair to say he's something of a bully.
In the realm of politics, he doesn't put up with what he perceives as bs. So somedude's point is valid.
No two sides to Trump. He is and out and out bully, exhibiting ALL the traits of a bully. One of those traits is that whenever he as gets even a tiny portion back at him that he dishes out with regularity he goes into FULL crybaby mode.

Vinny
Crybaby or just luring the suckers into pitbull territory? I am not quite sure.
Certified crybaby. Just checked my dictionary for the definition of crybaby and Trump's picture was there.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
User avatar
Mountaineer
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4353
Joined: Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:54 am

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Mountaineer » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:10 pm

vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:01 pm
Mountaineer wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:56 pm
vnatale wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:52 pm
dualstow wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 3:30 pm
I have to agree with doodle on this. It's a bit silly invoking Trump as someone who stands up to bullies...
..or is it?

I can see both sides.
On a personal level, yes, Trump will sue you for attacking him or give harder than he got. It's fair to say he's something of a bully.
In the realm of politics, he doesn't put up with what he perceives as bs. So somedude's point is valid.
No two sides to Trump. He is and out and out bully, exhibiting ALL the traits of a bully. One of those traits is that whenever he as gets even a tiny portion back at him that he dishes out with regularity he goes into FULL crybaby mode.

Vinny
Crybaby or just luring the suckers into pitbull territory? I am not quite sure.
Certified crybaby. Just checked my dictionary for the definition of crybaby and Trump's picture was there.

Vinny
I concede! You are the man. Unless I call for a recount. Or issue an Executive Order. Or ask the NYT to give an opinion. Or pardon myself. ;D
The darkness will always war against the light. And the light must always war against the darkness. You either let the darkness overcome you, or you overcome the darkness. The mission: Whatever darkness, compromise, or ungodly thing still exists in your life, no matter how small, today, root it out. There is no middle ground.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Xan » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:17 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:33 pm
There are now 10 people in my poll, a poll that is in this section that people can opt out of mind you, that have said yes they have considered leaving this forum because of politics. Why is that? Well, why when there is a car accident on the freeway to people slow down to look as they pass by? It's basically impossible to ignore it, whether or not you get notifications.
"Have considered" with no time window is really not at all meaningful. "Are you considering" would be much more meaningful. Why did you phrase it the way you did?

As for something more drastic, like banning political talk completely, it just isn't going to happen. "Splitting" the forum isn't going to happen either, because a "split" forum is just another forum, and part of the "split" would be the complete banning of political talk that already isn't going to happen.

We're all still getting used to the new ignorable subforum. And we're at "peak politics" as has been pointed out. Things will settle down. Please do just ignore the politics forum if you don't like it.

It seems that the real complaint is that there are discussions going on in the political forum that you don't like, and rather than just ignore them you want them to be banned. I honestly don't understand that viewpoint at all. The system gives you an easy way to just ignore the whole thing. If you're not tempted to navigate to a different site, then why are you tempted to click on "Politics"?

So you can stop asking. The answer is no. There will be no ban on political discussions. Having them in their own ignorable section is a fine solution that should satisfy everybody.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm

Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:17 pm
"Have considered" with no time window is really not at all meaningful. "Are you considering" would be much more meaningful. Why did you phrase it the way you did?
In hindsight I would have phrased it that way.
Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:17 pm
It seems that the real complaint is that there are discussions going on in the political forum that you don't like, and rather than just ignore them you want them to be banned. I honestly don't understand that viewpoint at all. The system gives you an easy way to just ignore the whole thing. If you're not tempted to navigate to a different site, then why are you tempted to click on "Politics"?
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.

I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.

Either way, I already conceded in my response to L82start that the way even this thread devolved into Trump vs not-Trump it was probably hopeless to even try to separate the two. I figured it was worth the suggestion, or at least the discussion. I hope you're right that "peak politics" will pass and things will settle back down. I love the political philosophical discussions. But the whole partisan politics thing... especially how every thread these days keeps devolving into an endless Trump vs not-Trump debate... I'm getting really frustrated. I'm trying to have patience and hope the storm blows over come Dec 14 with the elector vote, or at the very latest Jan 20 after the inauguration.
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5647
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by vnatale » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:37 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:17 pm
"Have considered" with no time window is really not at all meaningful. "Are you considering" would be much more meaningful. Why did you phrase it the way you did?
In hindsight I would have phrased it that way.
Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:17 pm
It seems that the real complaint is that there are discussions going on in the political forum that you don't like, and rather than just ignore them you want them to be banned. I honestly don't understand that viewpoint at all. The system gives you an easy way to just ignore the whole thing. If you're not tempted to navigate to a different site, then why are you tempted to click on "Politics"?
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.

I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.

Either way, I already conceded in my response to L82start that the way even this thread devolved into Trump vs not-Trump it was probably hopeless to even try to separate the two. I hope you're right that "peak politics" will pass and things will settle back down. I love the political philosophical discussions. But the whole partisan politics thing... especially how every thread these days keeps devolving into an endless Trump vs not-Trump debate... I'm getting really frustrated. I'm trying to have patience and hope the storm blows over come Dec 14 with the elector vote, or at the very latest Jan 20 after the inauguration.
Before you know it....the next 48 days will have passed!

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
User avatar
l82start
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
Posts: 1457
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 9:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by l82start » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:38 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm

I hope you're right that "peak politics" will pass and things will settle back down. I love the political philosophical discussions.
IT always has in the past.. i am sure it will again..
Government 2020+ - a BANANA REPUBLIC - if you can keep it

Belief is the death of intelligence. As soon as one believes a doctrine of any sort, or assumes certitude, one stops thinking about that aspect of existence
User avatar
Tortoise
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 2435
Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2010 2:35 am

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Tortoise » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:44 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
The politics section literally was created just a few weeks ago... up until ~Nov 12 I left the forum entirely for 6 months due to the politics getting on my nerves. Obviously, I'm thinking of leaving again.
Yeah, I realize the Politics sub-forum was just created in early November. But even prior to that, I don't remember seeing you post very often (if at all) in any of the political threads in the Other Discussions sub-forum. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's what I recall.

It seemed like you really jumped into the political threads for the first time starting on Nov 12 -- just three weeks ago -- yet your user profile says your Politics posts comprise over 20% of your total posts since you joined in Jan 2019. Subtracting your six-month sabbatical, that means that in just the most recent 5% of the time you've been active on this forum, you've produced over 20% of your total posts.

That's a really big sudden burst of participation in the Politics sub-forum for someone who says that politics is getting on his nerves and who has already opted out of Politics sub-forum notifications in his user settings.
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
Are you admitting that this is a forum only for Pro-Trump, non-analytical/quant investors, that do not have a VP? Because the fact that all people that have left or complained supposedly have common characteristics... characteristics you don't have... proves my point exactly. Would those people have left if they felt like this was an open, welcoming, non-hostile environment here?
Things in the US have become a lot more politically polarized in recent years and especially recent months. My perspective is that as a result, the forum members became politically divided largely into two groups: (1) the never-Trumpers, and (2) those who don't necessarily think that Trump is Orange Hitler.

Both groups have been fairly vocal and well-represented in recent political threads, so I don't get the sense that the voices of the never-Trumpers are being drowned in a flood of American flags and spray tan. In some threads, maybe, but not all of them. It just seems that in general, the never-Trumpers here are the ones who seem to get so fed up with heated political discussions that they choose to leave the forum permanently rather than just opting out of the Politics sub-forum, taking a short forum vacation, or maybe blocking one or two users who raise their blood pressure the most.

Since the never-Trumper members tend to emphasize decorum, I often get the sense that they expect others to compromise (e.g., "meet in the middle") for the sake of appearances and orderliness. Strong disagreement can be terribly messy, and that's very distasteful and uncomfortable to the decorum folks. By contrast, the members who emphasize policy or substance over decorum tend to attach themselves strongly to what they have determined is philosophically right or truthful and are loath to compromise on that just for the sake of "meeting in the middle." Their position is that in truth vs. falsehood and right vs. wrong, there is often no room for compromise -- integrity is an all-or-nothing proposition.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Xan » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:45 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.
I don't see any other reason why the ignorable subforum wouldn't solve the problem. It seems that the mere existence of discussion you don't like is too much to tolerate. If I'm wrong, can you explain again why the ignorable subforum doesn't solve your problem?
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.
Well the title of your thread is "I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing". And the main thing you seem to want is to create a completely separate forum for political discussions (which you are welcome to do, by the way), and then ban them here. So yes, you have called and are calling for a ban on political discussions.

Could you describe again exactly what suggestion you're making and how it would improve the situation? It isn't that I don't care, I promise.


This came up weeks ago and we implemented a solution. Maybe it would make more sense to start by describing what's good and bad about the solution that we literally just put into place, rather than acting like nothing's been done?
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:48 pm

Tortoise wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:44 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
The politics section literally was created just a few weeks ago... up until ~Nov 12 I left the forum entirely for 6 months due to the politics getting on my nerves. Obviously, I'm thinking of leaving again.
Yeah, I realize the Politics sub-forum was just created in early November. But even prior to that, I don't remember seeing you post very often (if at all) in any of the political threads in the Other Discussions sub-forum. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's what I recall.

It seemed like you really jumped into the political threads for the first time starting on Nov 12 -- just three weeks ago -- yet your user profile says your Politics posts comprise over 20% of your total posts since you joined in Jan 2019. Subtracting your six-month sabbatical, that means that in just the most recent 5% of the time you've been active on this forum, you've produced over 20% of your total posts.

That's a really big sudden burst of participation in the Politics sub-forum for someone who says that politics is getting on his nerves and who has already opted out of Politics sub-forum notifications in his user settings.
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
Are you admitting that this is a forum only for Pro-Trump, non-analytical/quant investors, that do not have a VP? Because the fact that all people that have left or complained supposedly have common characteristics... characteristics you don't have... proves my point exactly. Would those people have left if they felt like this was an open, welcoming, non-hostile environment here?
Things in the US have become a lot more politically polarized in recent years and especially recent months. My perspective is that as a result, the forum members became politically divided largely into two groups: (1) the never-Trumpers, and (2) those who don't necessarily think that Trump is Orange Hitler.

Both groups have been fairly vocal and well-represented in recent political threads, so I don't get the sense that the voices of the never-Trumpers are being drowned in a flood of American flags and spray tan. In some threads, maybe, but not all of them. It just seems that in general, the never-Trumpers here are the ones who seem to get so fed up with heated political discussions that they choose to leave the forum permanently rather than just opting out of the Politics sub-forum, taking a short forum vacation, or maybe blocking one or two users who raise their blood pressure the most.

Since the never-Trumper members tend to emphasize decorum, I often get the sense that they expect others to compromise (e.g., "meet in the middle") for the sake of appearances and orderliness. Strong disagreement can be terribly messy, and that's very distasteful and uncomfortable to the decorum folks. By contrast, the members who emphasize policy or substance over decorum tend to attach themselves strongly to what they have determined is philosophically right or truthful and are loath to compromise on that just for the sake of "meeting in the middle." Their position is that in truth vs. falsehood and right vs. wrong, there is often no room for compromise -- integrity is an all-or-nothing proposition.
This is a great representation of everything I have been pointing out. Look at all of the judgment in this. Both of me personally, and of everyone he thinks is on my side. Look at the whole painting of his side as this great perfect ideal with "truth" and "right' and "no compromise" and "integrity", and everybody else on the other side obviously lacking these things. Get over yourself man!!!
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:52 pm

Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:45 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.
I don't see any other reason why the ignorable subforum wouldn't solve the problem. It seems that the mere existence of discussion you don't like is too much to tolerate. If I'm wrong, can you explain again why the ignorable subforum doesn't solve your problem?
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.
Well the title of your thread is "I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing". And the main thing you seem to want is to create a completely separate forum for political discussions (which you are welcome to do, by the way), and then ban them here. So yes, you have called and are calling for a ban on political discussions.

Could you describe again exactly what suggestion you're making and how it would improve the situation? It isn't that I don't care, I promise.


This came up weeks ago and we implemented a solution. Maybe it would make more sense to start by describing what's good and bad about the solution that we literally just put into place, rather than acting like nothing's been done?
I basically said everything I really had to say on the subject is all back on page 1. From that point on the tangents came out. I was meaning it as a suggestion. It is what I think would be best. But hey, it's your forum, and it is what it is.
Last edited by pmward on Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Xan » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:53 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:52 pm
Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:45 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.
I don't see any other reason why the ignorable subforum wouldn't solve the problem. It seems that the mere existence of discussion you don't like is too much to tolerate. If I'm wrong, can you explain again why the ignorable subforum doesn't solve your problem?
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.
Well the title of your thread is "I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing". And the main thing you seem to want is to create a completely separate forum for political discussions (which you are welcome to do, by the way), and then ban them here. So yes, you have called and are calling for a ban on political discussions.

Could you describe again exactly what suggestion you're making and how it would improve the situation? It isn't that I don't care, I promise.


This came up weeks ago and we implemented a solution. Maybe it would make more sense to start by describing what's good and bad about the solution that we literally just put into place, rather than acting like nothing's been done?
I basically said everything I really had to say on the subject is all back on page 1. From that point on the tangents came out.
So... The first post where you call for a ban on political discussion here. And just now you get after me for saying you called for such a ban. hmm.
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:56 pm

Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:53 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:52 pm
Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:45 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
This is part of the problem. The generalization and assumptions. You don't really know that this is the reason people are upset. So you make this broad assumption and use that as a way to discount every other opinion. This happens A LOT on this forum. The fact is that many people have left because of this, and many people have considered leaving because of this. I personally don't think it's the content that offends people, it's the way people are treated.
I don't see any other reason why the ignorable subforum wouldn't solve the problem. It seems that the mere existence of discussion you don't like is too much to tolerate. If I'm wrong, can you explain again why the ignorable subforum doesn't solve your problem?
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:33 pm
I've also never once asked for a "ban" on political discussions. So you're being very presumptuous there as well. Like when you try to tell me what I think and why I made the suggestion, and it totally doesn't match what I think or why I made the suggestion... like you obviously don't get it or don't care. And that is frustrating.
Well the title of your thread is "I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing". And the main thing you seem to want is to create a completely separate forum for political discussions (which you are welcome to do, by the way), and then ban them here. So yes, you have called and are calling for a ban on political discussions.

Could you describe again exactly what suggestion you're making and how it would improve the situation? It isn't that I don't care, I promise.


This came up weeks ago and we implemented a solution. Maybe it would make more sense to start by describing what's good and bad about the solution that we literally just put into place, rather than acting like nothing's been done?
I basically said everything I really had to say on the subject is all back on page 1. From that point on the tangents came out.
So... The first post where you call for a ban on political discussion here. And just now you get after me for saying you called for such a ban. hmm.
Show me one place I suggested you "ban" political posts. Matter of fact, if you read the entire first page you will see I said we should not moderate the political discussions that happen naturally. Mainly that having the separate sub-forum to encourage them I don't think was a fit... for all the reasons I mentioned on page 1. So please, quit putting words in my mouth.
User avatar
vnatale
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 5647
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 8:56 pm
Location: Massachusetts
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by vnatale » Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:57 pm

Tortoise wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:44 pm
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
The politics section literally was created just a few weeks ago... up until ~Nov 12 I left the forum entirely for 6 months due to the politics getting on my nerves. Obviously, I'm thinking of leaving again.
Yeah, I realize the Politics sub-forum was just created in early November. But even prior to that, I don't remember seeing you post very often (if at all) in any of the political threads in the Other Discussions sub-forum. Maybe I'm mistaken, but that's what I recall.

It seemed like you really jumped into the political threads for the first time starting on Nov 12 -- just three weeks ago -- yet your user profile says your Politics posts comprise over 20% of your total posts since you joined in Jan 2019. Subtracting your six-month sabbatical, that means that in just the most recent 5% of the time you've been active on this forum, you've produced over 20% of your total posts.

That's a really big sudden burst of participation in the Politics sub-forum for someone who says that politics is getting on his nerves and who has already opted out of Politics sub-forum notifications in his user settings.
pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 2:56 pm
Are you admitting that this is a forum only for Pro-Trump, non-analytical/quant investors, that do not have a VP? Because the fact that all people that have left or complained supposedly have common characteristics... characteristics you don't have... proves my point exactly. Would those people have left if they felt like this was an open, welcoming, non-hostile environment here?
Things in the US have become a lot more politically polarized in recent years and especially recent months. My perspective is that as a result, the forum members became politically divided largely into two groups: (1) the never-Trumpers, and (2) those who don't necessarily think that Trump is Orange Hitler.

Both groups have been fairly vocal and well-represented in recent political threads, so I don't get the sense that the voices of the never-Trumpers are being drowned in a flood of American flags and spray tan. In some threads, maybe, but not all of them. It just seems that in general, the never-Trumpers here are the ones who seem to get so fed up with heated political discussions that they choose to leave the forum permanently rather than just opting out of the Politics sub-forum, taking a short forum vacation, or maybe blocking one or two users who raise their blood pressure the most.

Since the never-Trumper members tend to emphasize decorum, I often get the sense that they expect others to compromise (e.g., "meet in the middle") for the sake of appearances and orderliness. Strong disagreement can be terribly messy, and that's very distasteful and uncomfortable to the decorum folks. By contrast, the members who emphasize policy or substance over decorum tend to attach themselves strongly to what they have determined is philosophically right or truthful and are loath to compromise on that just for the sake of "meeting in the middle." Their position is that in truth vs. falsehood and right vs. wrong, there is often no room for compromise -- integrity is an all-or-nothing proposition.
Totally agree! However, it is so puzzling to me how a man such as Trump who exhibits no integrity gets the support of so many who DO have integrity.

Vinny
Above provided by: Vinny, who always says: "I only regret that I have but one lap to give to my cats."
pmward
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1731
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2019 4:39 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by pmward » Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:01 pm

I made a suggestion and I laid out my reasoning. It's ok if you disagree. But it really is frustrating when people keep making false assumptions and putting words in my mouth.

Also, I'm not the only one. There were 10 people that voted "yes" and countless others that left this forum. So I think it was a legitimate subject to bring up for discussion.

I've also since conceded to l82start a page or 2 ago, so it's kind of moot at this point.
Last edited by pmward on Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Xan
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 3277
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:51 pm

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Xan » Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:02 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:56 pm
Mainly that having the separate sub-forum to encourage them I don't think was a fit... for all the reasons I mentioned on page 1. So please, quit putting words in my mouth.
That is something I don't think you've said before, and maybe you thought you did (or that it would be understood from what you actually were saying).

So it's your position that the separate Politics subforum has increased the political discussion here and was a bad idea? Finally there's a sensical position that can be discussed. Okay, maybe you're right!

Maybe we should discuss questions like:

* Has there been more political discussion here since the Politics subforum was created?

* Has it been more polite or more acrimonious?

* How much of the discussion/argument has been driven by you personally, pmward?

* Is it off-putting to members/visitors, particularly given the ability to ignore it?

(I honestly don't know the answers to these, as I've opted out of the Politics subforum myself. It's been really nice.)
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 11628
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Contact:

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by dualstow » Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:27 pm

pmward wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 5:56 pm

Show me one place I suggested you "ban" political posts. Matter of fact, if you read the entire first page you will see I said we should not moderate the political discussions that happen naturally. Mainly that having the separate sub-forum to encourage them I don't think was a fit... for all the reasons I mentioned on page 1. So please, quit putting words in my mouth.
I don’t get it. You didn’t use the word ban as far as I can tell, but you want the segregated space for politics removed. I think the logicial conclusion here is that you wouldn’t want politics to flow back into the regular section. However, you are fine with political discussion mixed back in with the investing? Why would you want that?

At least with the separate section, we have a shot at the investing section sticking to investing.
Feels like the end of the everything rally.
User avatar
Maddy
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 1242
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2015 8:43 am

Re: I Think This Forum Should Stick To Investing

Post by Maddy » Wed Dec 02, 2020 6:29 pm

Xan wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 1:21 pm
Smith1776 wrote:
Wed Dec 02, 2020 12:05 pm
I don't understand. The whole point of the politics subforum was to keep politics separate from the rest of the site's content. As far as I can see it's been very successful so far. If you don't like the political content, then just don't browse this area? ???

Well, that's the obvious solution, isn't it? If you don't want to read posts about politics, then don't go to the Politics forum! Ironically, pmward has been one of the most prolific, persistent posters on the Politics forum in recent weeks. He's not only voluntarily participated in discussions of highly incendiary topics, he's started a good many of them.

The forum was specifically set up recently for the express purpose of creating a segregated area, separate from the investment subforums, in which political discussions could occur. Xan made clear at the time the Politics forum was set up that members are free to opt out of notifications--meaning that any member can make the Politics forum and all of its content disappear--100 percent--from sight. There is a "sticky" at the top of the forum that reminds members of this opt-out feature.

But it's obviously not good enough for pmward that he has the ability to opt out. And it never will be good enough until each and every other member is prevented from hearing the posts he finds so disagreeable.

This really takes the cake. What better example of the consummately authoritarian type of thinking that is emblematic of the Progressive Left. It's not enough that they have the freedom to live their lives in an echo chamber. They want to control what YOU hear. That's the whole point.
Post Reply