Gold insurance?

Discussion of the Gold portion of the Permanent Portfolio

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply

Opinion: should one definitely insure physical gold?

Yes
0
No votes
No
7
100%
 
Total votes: 7
User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Gold insurance?

Post by BearBones »

Curious as to the consensus. I have been averse to insuring gold for 4 reasons:
1. Hassle factor
2. Not convinced that I would get reimbursed (how to definitely show gold lost or stolen?)
3. Ongoing cost
4. Loss of anonymity!
Last edited by BearBones on Sun Aug 19, 2012 9:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Gold insurance?

Post by MachineGhost »

BearBones wrote: Curious as to the consensus. I have been averse to insuring gold for 3 reasons:
1. Hassle factor
2. Not convinced that I would get reimbursed (how to definitely show gold lost or stolen?)
3. Loss of anonymity!
For #2 you would have to take digital pictures of each piece as well as save the purchase receipts.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
User avatar
BearBones
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 689
Joined: Sat Sep 18, 2010 4:26 pm

Re: Gold insurance?

Post by BearBones »

MachineGhost wrote:
BearBones wrote: Curious as to the consensus. I have been averse to insuring gold for 3 reasons:
1. Hassle factor
2. Not convinced that I would get reimbursed (how to definitely show gold lost or stolen?)
3. Loss of anonymity!
For #2 you would have to take digital pictures of each piece as well as save the purchase receipts.
This demonstrates ownership. But how do you demonstrate that it was lost or stolen? In the case of a safe deposit box (vs held at home), this might be more straight forward. But for gold held in a SDB, I wonder what the consensus is regarding necessity of insurance, since it would seem that SDBs have a very low probability of theft or loss. Just not sure benefit outweighs ongoing cost.
User avatar
MachineGhost
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 10054
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Gold insurance?

Post by MachineGhost »

BearBones wrote: This demonstrates ownership. But how do you demonstrate that it was lost or stolen? In the case of a safe deposit box (vs held at home), this might be more straight forward. But for gold held in a SDB, I wonder what the consensus is regarding necessity of insurance, since it would seem that SDBs have a very low probability of theft or loss. Just not sure benefit outweighs ongoing cost.
I'm sure an affidavit along with police report of the theft/robbery or similar documents from the bank would substantiate that.
"All generous minds have a horror of what are commonly called 'Facts'. They are the brute beasts of the intellectual domain." -- Thomas Hobbes

Disclaimer: I am not a broker, dealer, investment advisor, physician, theologian or prophet.  I should not be considered as legally permitted to render such advice!
Post Reply