Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
Moderator: Global Moderator
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
Yikes. I don't know how anyone can untangle a mess like that.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
I'm surprised that the family apparently has no interest in trying to save the baby.
Q: “Do you have funny shaped balloons?”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
A: “Not unless round is funny.”
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
If I were the family I'd transfer to a hospital with more sensible physicians. The position taken by the hospital in question is completely ridiculous. And may I say, the torture that family is going through is horrible and completely unfair.
The law says it's not legal for a pregnant woman to refuse TREATMENT. Once someone is brain dead, ongoing life support is not treatment because there is nothing to treat. The law doesn't apply. It's intended for situations like a pregnant woman refusing, say, antibiotics for an infection.
The hospital is probably afraid of tangling with the courts because it's too small and maybe doesn't have a great reputation. An academic center like Baylor would be far less likely to be questioned.
And, it's not clear what exactly happened to the woman in question, but it's hard to imagine a scenario that didn't affect the fetus. The chances of that fetus being anywhere near normal (or even viable) is pretty much zero.
The law says it's not legal for a pregnant woman to refuse TREATMENT. Once someone is brain dead, ongoing life support is not treatment because there is nothing to treat. The law doesn't apply. It's intended for situations like a pregnant woman refusing, say, antibiotics for an infection.
The hospital is probably afraid of tangling with the courts because it's too small and maybe doesn't have a great reputation. An academic center like Baylor would be far less likely to be questioned.
And, it's not clear what exactly happened to the woman in question, but it's hard to imagine a scenario that didn't affect the fetus. The chances of that fetus being anywhere near normal (or even viable) is pretty much zero.
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
I guess the plan is to keep her heart beating for six months, carve the baby out, and finally let the family have the corpse. That's disgusting.
Oh, such a beautiful tarmac. Look how smooth it is. See how smooth it is? And it's warm, and it's hard. - Charley Boorman Long Way Round
- Pointedstick
- Executive Member
- Posts: 8883
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:21 pm
- Contact:
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
Update: she's braindead and the fetus is not viable. They're pulling the plug. What a tragedy all around.
Human behavior is economic behavior. The particulars may vary, but competition for limited resources remains a constant.
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
- CEO Nwabudike Morgan
Re: Pregnant and Forced to Stay On Life support
The child wouldn't have had a mother, which is probably why the family wasn't interested in saving it. Plus, if they knew their stuff, they might've known that there's zero possibility of healthy prenatal development in a mother who doesn't move around, do, or say anything.
I don't understand the actions of the hospital, though, if she were fully brain dead when she arrived. Brain dead people start decomposing after only a month or two, even if you keep them on life support. Only a comatose or vegetative mother could've made it to term.
I don't understand the actions of the hospital, though, if she were fully brain dead when she arrived. Brain dead people start decomposing after only a month or two, even if you keep them on life support. Only a comatose or vegetative mother could've made it to term.