Improving the PP through simplification

General Discussion on the Permanent Portfolio Strategy

Moderator: Global Moderator

Post Reply
Kevin K.
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:37 pm

Improving the PP through simplification

Post by Kevin K. »

Okay here's an out-of-left-field suggestion that came up on (of all places) the Bogleheads forums:

https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... CMryVLBwXi

I guess you could call this "The Three Fund Portfolio" Harry Browne-style. ;)

I see nothing but advantages here: you eliminate the tail risk of the 30 year Treasuries, have oodles of liquidity due to the cash-like nature of the short-term Treasuries and plenty of gold for SHTF insurance. Replacing the VTI with VT would make it into even more of a bunker. I mean if the PP is for money you can't afford to lose.....
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4050
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by Smith1776 »

I would personally make it intermediate-term treasury bonds instead of short-term, but this is a perfectly valid approach too.
www.allterrainportfolio.com
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4747
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by mathjak107 »

33% gold is more than i would want . i like gold but not that much
User avatar
Smith1776
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4050
Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2017 6:01 pm

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by Smith1776 »

Agree with Mathjak O0
www.allterrainportfolio.com
User avatar
dualstow
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 15714
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2010 10:18 am
Location: searching for the lost Xanadu
Contact:

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by dualstow »

I do like long bonds less than I did when I was younger. Even so, “simplifying” by removing them seems like simplifying one’s hand by lopping the thumb off.
Whistling tunes / We hide in the dunes by the seaside
Whistling tunes / We're kissing baboons in the jungle
Kevin K.
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 592
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by Kevin K. »

mathjak107 wrote: Fri Jan 30, 2026 12:40 pm 33% gold is more than i would want . i like gold but not that much
It works even better with only 25% gold and more stocks - and trounces the regular PP even more thoroughly:

https://www.portfoliovisualizer.com/bac ... Krp1br6tiF
User avatar
mathjak107
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 4747
Joined: Fri Jun 19, 2015 2:54 am
Location: bayside queens ny
Contact:

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by mathjak107 »

that i can see
whatchamacallit
Executive Member
Executive Member
Posts: 766
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 7:32 pm

Re: Improving the PP through simplification

Post by whatchamacallit »

This is what I have been doing for a while now. 33% stocks, 33% treasury bills, 33% gold.

I got lucky and just rebalanced out of gold before the latest crash.

I believe it was the belangp videos that first got me comfortable with 33% gold with his 67% stocks, 33% gold allocation.

https://gyroscopicinvesting.com/forum/v ... hp?t=10777



The longer duration treasuries do back test better but that is from higher rates on the longer duration bonds.

I am not chaining myself to using treasury bills but plan on using the Swedroe 20 basis point rule that I see you posted about on bogle heads yourself. Thank you very much. I have it bookmarked.

https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=350803


The bonds need to make it worth it.
Post Reply